PaulWog
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,153
- Reaction score
- 188
- Location
- Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I've heard a lot of people (even myself) argue that the 35mm and 50mm on an APS-C are redundant. Yet, on full-frame, people argue that 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm are all great focal lengths, and to some they constitute a version of the "holy trinity" of primes (and for others 24mm & 28mm come into play).
On APS-C, such a setup would look more like a 24mm, the 35mm, and the 50mm. Yet, these focal lengths (24-35, and 35-50) are generally considered to overlap and be "redundant" on APS-C. Is this due to budget restrictions, or possibly a difference in the DoF that one gets on APS-C, that changes peoples' opinions?
On APS-C, such a setup would look more like a 24mm, the 35mm, and the 50mm. Yet, these focal lengths (24-35, and 35-50) are generally considered to overlap and be "redundant" on APS-C. Is this due to budget restrictions, or possibly a difference in the DoF that one gets on APS-C, that changes peoples' opinions?