How to achieve this look in post?

[shutterr]

Hello everyone,

I'm new to this forum and also kind of a newbie in photography. I want to know if it is possible to achieve this look ( in the attachment) in lightroom, if so then how? or how can i get this look in photoshop?



Thanks

 

[Edsport]

I don't see any attachment...

 

[Tomasko]

Nor any link...
(+ don't post work of others here, provide ONLY the link to it. Otherwise you'll be violating the rules)

 

[Peano]

(+ don't post work of others here, provide ONLY the link to it. Otherwise you'll be violating the rules)

And if you violate the rules, God will visit the ten plagues of Egypt upon your land, and you will live amid famine and pestilence until the end of your days.

 

[480sparky]

And if you violate the rules, God will visit the ten plagues of Egypt upon your land, and you will live amid famine and pestilence until the end of your days.

Of which we will expect photos of.

 

[Tomasko]

(+ don't post work of others here, provide ONLY the link to it. Otherwise you'll be violating the rules)

And if you violate the rules, God will visit the ten plagues of Egypt upon your land, and you will live amid famine and pestilence until the end of your days.

Pardon? You really want to advocate violating author rights, forum rules etc?

 

[Peano]

Pardon? You really want to advocate violating author rights, forum rules etc?

Especially the "etc". :coffee:

 

[Tomasko]

Pardon? You really want to advocate violating author rights, forum rules etc?

Especially the "etc". :coffee:

How's your bridge? Plenty of visitors today?

 

[Peano]

Since the OP seems to have cantered off into the sunset, and since this forum
seems to have a lot of armchair lawyers on board who profess a strong grasp
of copyright law, you might enjoy trying your hand at a case. Here it is:

Jones, a photographer and graphic designer, created a poster for a band
to use on a concert tour. The next year, another poster, another tour --
and so on for many years.

Smith, an author, decides to write a history of the band covering 30 years
of its career. He discovers the posters produced over the years by Jones,
who still holds the copyright.

Smith negotiates with Jones for a license agreement to use the posters
in his book, but they can’t agree on a fee. So Smith decides to use the
posters anyway. He places reduced copies of the images throughout his
book to illustrate the group’s concerts over the years.

Jones sues Smith for copyright infringement. Smith claims fair use.

You be the judge. Who prevails in this case? Smith? Or Jones?

Explain your verdict.​

 

[Derrel]

Smith prevails for a number of reasons. The use of the posters in the book is for a historical or scholarly examination of a successful band that has performed hundreds of shows in public. The use of the posters, at the tremendously reduced size in the book, does not in ANY WAY, at all, diminish the value of original posters held by collectors, and may in fact, serve to ELEVATE the demand for, interest in, and retail value of, original posters. There is NO INTENT TO DECEIVE or to confuse the public by using the posters in a book: the public will NOT be mislead in to believing the poster announcing the November 5, 1985 showing at The Whiskey a Go-Go is in fact advertising a current or future performance of another group or band,and the posters are clearly not "posters", but rather part of the historic record of the band's long public career. Since the posters were originally used as advertising for the band, and the same photographer shot them all, printing the small, book-sized images of the advertising the band used over a 30-year period can easily be justified by the book's author, and by the court, as a perfectly acceptable valid form of artistic criticism. The author of the book is also not trying to profit from the sale of the images per se, but rather is using the images as a small part of a much larger work, that being the book chronicling 30-year history of the band.

 

[shootermcgavin]

Since the OP seems to have cantered off into the sunset, and since this forum seems to have a lot of armchair lawyers on board who profess a strong graspof copyright law, you might enjoy trying your hand at a case. Here it is:

Jones, a photographer and graphic designer, created a poster for a band to use on a concert tour. The next year, another poster, another tour -- and so on for many years.Smith, an author, decides to write a history of the band covering 30 years of its career. He discovers the posters produced over the years by Jones, who still holds the copyright.Smith negotiates with Jones for a license agreement to use the posters in his book, but they can’t agree on a fee. So Smith decides to use the posters anyway. He places reduced copies of the images throughout his book to illustrate the group’s concerts over the years. Jones sues Smith for copyright infringement. Smith claims fair use. You be the judge. Who prevails in this case? Smith? Or Jones? Explain your verdict.​

Depends, do either of them have an uncle Vinnie?

 

[Derrel]

Since the OP seems to have cantered off into the sunset, and since this forum seems to have a lot of armchair lawyers on board who profess a strong graspof copyright law, you might enjoy trying your hand at a case. Here it is:

Jones, a photographer and graphic designer, created a poster for a band to use on a concert tour. The next year, another poster, another tour -- and so on for many years.Smith, an author, decides to write a history of the band covering 30 years of its career. He discovers the posters produced over the years by Jones, who still holds the copyright.Smith negotiates with Jones for a license agreement to use the posters in his book, but they can’t agree on a fee. So Smith decides to use the posters anyway. He places reduced copies of the images throughout his book to illustrate the group’s concerts over the years. Jones sues Smith for copyright infringement. Smith claims fair use. You be the judge. Who prevails in this case? Smith? Or Jones? Explain your verdict.​

Depends, do either of them have an uncle Vinnie?

And even MORE-importantly, will Marissa Tomei be playing the part of the girlfriend???

 

[Peano]

Smith prevails for a number of reasons. The use of the posters in the book is for a historical or scholarly examination of a successful band that has performed hundreds of shows in public. The use of the posters, at the tremendously reduced size in the book, does not in ANY WAY, at all, diminish the value of original posters held by collectors, and may in fact, serve to ELEVATE the demand for, interest in, and retail value of, original posters. There is NO INTENT TO DECEIVE or to confuse the public by using the posters in a book: the public will NOT be mislead in to believing the poster announcing the November 5, 1985 showing at The Whiskey a Go-Go is in fact advertising a current or future performance of another group or band,and the posters are clearly not "posters", but rather part of the historic record of the band's long public career. Since the posters were originally used as advertising for the band, and the same photographer shot them all, printing the small, book-sized images of the advertising the band used over a 30-year period can easily be justified by the book's author, and by the court, as a perfectly acceptable valid form of artistic criticism. The author of the book is also not trying to profit from the sale of the images per se, but rather is using the images as a small part of a much larger work, that being the book chronicling 30-year history of the band.

Your verdict is correct and your analysis is mostly correct (I don't believe intent to deceive the public is relevant to determining fair use).

It's refreshing to see someone on this forum who actually understands the fair use exception to copyright infringement.