Tight Knot
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 1,398
- Reaction score
- 159
- Location
- Boca Raton, FL
- Website
- www.lensphotoworld.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
So, I may be dumb for doing free work, knowing full well that all it ever brings you is more free work, and I had an opportunity to prove this well-known concept to myself again (quite a number of times actually).
The true definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results each time. So, am I insane or just well-meaning and too trusting?
Then again, maybe I'm wrong and expecting too much.
A few weeks ago, I was shooting a town parade for my own enjoyment, not as a paid gig, and 2 of the officials saw me, and asked me if I would be prepared to email them some of my photos for use in the weekly town gazette. No pay, but they would make sure to credit the photos to me.
Well, I was there anyway, shooting and then editing anyway, so I figured that all it entailed was for me to go one step further and send an email. No pay, no big deal, but some free advertising.
So, I sent the email with some photos with my watermark on them.
I did not have a chance to see the publication, and was recently on a night hike that had been organized by the town, and of course took photos again. I was again asked to send the photos to them for publication in the same weekly town gazette.
So I thought, sure, no problem, more free advertising.
Well, surprise, surprise. I just saw both of the publications, and not only was my name not mentioned, and no credit given to me, they had taken the liberty of cropping my photos, making sure to remove the watermark.
I guess the question is whether I should be royally pissed that they cropped around my watermarks, or if that is normally done?
If they wanted the photos without watermarks, they could have just asked me to give the photos to them without the watermark on them, without them taking the liberty of butchering my photos.
The fact that they did not add my name, just teaches me (again) not to do free work, but if they would have at least left the watermark in (which is my website), I would have been happy, as that would have been close enough to the same as giving me credit,
Looking for some fresh perspectives on this, as I am too biased at this point to know what is right or wrong.
The true definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results each time. So, am I insane or just well-meaning and too trusting?
Then again, maybe I'm wrong and expecting too much.
A few weeks ago, I was shooting a town parade for my own enjoyment, not as a paid gig, and 2 of the officials saw me, and asked me if I would be prepared to email them some of my photos for use in the weekly town gazette. No pay, but they would make sure to credit the photos to me.
Well, I was there anyway, shooting and then editing anyway, so I figured that all it entailed was for me to go one step further and send an email. No pay, no big deal, but some free advertising.
So, I sent the email with some photos with my watermark on them.
I did not have a chance to see the publication, and was recently on a night hike that had been organized by the town, and of course took photos again. I was again asked to send the photos to them for publication in the same weekly town gazette.
So I thought, sure, no problem, more free advertising.
Well, surprise, surprise. I just saw both of the publications, and not only was my name not mentioned, and no credit given to me, they had taken the liberty of cropping my photos, making sure to remove the watermark.
I guess the question is whether I should be royally pissed that they cropped around my watermarks, or if that is normally done?
If they wanted the photos without watermarks, they could have just asked me to give the photos to them without the watermark on them, without them taking the liberty of butchering my photos.
The fact that they did not add my name, just teaches me (again) not to do free work, but if they would have at least left the watermark in (which is my website), I would have been happy, as that would have been close enough to the same as giving me credit,
Looking for some fresh perspectives on this, as I am too biased at this point to know what is right or wrong.