IS and "stops"

Here's a good example of what's confusing me:

From another thread..



What is "1 stop of light"?? -1EV? A 1-stop reduction in aperture? (going from f/5.6 to f/4)? I just don't get it..

Although Boblybill has explained it perfectly I'll just attack it from a slightly different angle in case it helps.

A stop is(was), literally, a place where the control ring came to a stop (also called a detente) on the aperture control ring.

The stops were chosen to exactly halve/double the amount of light admitted by the iris. 'Full' stops progress by the square root of two (because the iris is an area and thus you square the linear measurement of it's nominal diameter which is what the focal length of the lens is divided by to produce the number, to obtain the effect on the admission of light).

However, because there are three things that can be varied to change the exposure (as Boblybill enumerates above), photographers got into the habit of refering to any change of any of the three that doubled of halved the exposure a 'stop'.

Thus doubling of halving the ISO is refered to as a change of 'a stop' as is doubling or halving the shutter speed.
 
Perfect, Bill.. I think that explains it.

So.. to summarize:

f/stops: 1, 1.4, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32
Shutter: bulb, 30, 15, 8, 4, 2, 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/15, 1/30, 1/60, 1/125, 1/250, 1/500, 1/1000, ...(then what? 1/2000? seems like too big of a jump)
ISO: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200
 
What they mean is that the recommended shutterspeed for a vibration free handheld shot is 4 stops lower.

So if you could shoot a steady 200mm photo at 1/250th without IS you should be able to shoot the same shot "shake free" at 1/15th of a second.

This is an exaggeration btw, IS typically gains you about 1.5-2 stops, and it does NOTHING to keep your subject still.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top