The thing is, this isn't a trivial issue. If you have internet access, the odds are excellent that you live in a country that spends money acquiring and funding art. Your money is being spent on Art with a capital A.
Why? Ostensibly because Art is something that is inherent in humans, that it betters and enbiggens us, that it is an inherently Good Thing that ought to be Funded to some degree. Whatever Art is, it seems to change over time, so we can't just just write down a 17 page chunk of some legal code that defines it, and then we fund That but not Anything Else. Since it evolves, someone needs to try to keep up. Which means these conversations have to continue. How are we going to notice when Photography stops being Art, if we're not occasionally asking the question?
Since it's your money being spent, you at least have a right to have a position on it, and arguably you ought to have a position on it. If you have a camera, you're at least slightly connected to the issues at hand, and perhaps might find yourself more inclined to a position.
By all means, dismiss it as a stupid conversation had by stupid eggheaded stupid people, but you're dismissing a conversation that actually matters to society, to us as people, and which is, perhaps a few steps removed, about spending your tax monies.