Is the t3i really that much better than the t3?

[412 Burgh]

I think you guys all overwhelmed the OP and scared him away with all of this information lol.

 

[tecboy]

Get Nikon, and you really supprise the heck out of your wife!

 

[tmoore4075]

I have owned and used both cameras, just sold the T3 a few months ago.

I don’t think those ridiculously rigorous technical comparisons some websites (like dpreview.com) can provide are of much value to you here, where it seems you simply want to know the real-world differences of the two cameras in general use.

This list might not be exhaustive, but the main things the T3i brings to the table over the T3 are:

• Articulating screen – not that big of a deal for those who prefer to look through the viewfinder, as I do. Seems to me, it’s just one more thing that can break. But these days, people seem to like the screens, and if so, the ability to move it is handy.
• More megapixels – this probably isn’t going to make the slightest practical difference
• Built-in wireless master flash – very nice feature, but useless unless you have fairly pricey Canon speedlights, and know how to use them.
• Aforementioned spot-metering mode. If your wife is like 99% of consumers, she won’t ever miss this, assuming she even knows what it is. Besides, she can always use partial metering on the T3, which is similar.
• External microphone input jack for video. If you don’t shoot video, who cares? Even if you do, you’ll probably just use the built-in mic anyway
• Slightly better “feel” to the camera body. Neither camera is a high end piece, but the T3 does not have any grippy material on the body and as a result has a rather cheap plasticky feel. Probably not a big deal at all, if your wife already likes the camera.

You’re not going to see any differences in “image quality” between the two cameras in real world use.

That’s really it. I upgraded to the T3i because I wanted the master flash capability and the price was so good that it cost me nothing, after recouping the cash by selling the T3.

If you’ve got money to burn, go with the T3i I guess, but unless you see $200 worth of value in my list here, I’d say go T3.

This is probably the best advice I've seen about the T3 vs the T3i. I'm also in the market and looking at both of these so this actually helps. Haven't made up my mind but it helps. Really it's coming down to if I want to spend the money and get a T3i or spend the same money and get a T3 with an extra telephoto lens of 55-250mm.

 

[6kimages]

buy her the t3i , in case she is knowledgeable and familiar, if not it will let her expand her horizons with time

 

[paigew]

I just upgraded this month from the T3i. It is a really great camera, your wife will love it. If for no other reason, buy it for the higher iso capabilities.

 

[EDL]

Couple things:

Derrel, I almost always agree or at least value what you have to say, but I absolutely disagree with you on spot metering. I'm a noob and I found spot metering very easy to use and it works best for me in general. No, it's not to be used 100% of the time, but I found it easier to get the shots I wanted, the way I wanted using spot...or at least with less fiddling and fewer "tries". Maybe it's just me, maybe I've been lucky, or maybe I just haven't learned enough.

I would go with the T3i over the T3, no question.

Articulated screen. Very handy to have. I actually use it more than I thought I would. If you have the camera mounted on a tripod very low to the ground, or need to hold the camera up higher, or just odd angle/placement shots it's much, much easier and comfortable to use than trying to contort your body and face to look through the view finder.

As far as it "breaking", some say it's just something to break, but I say, these are people who've just never used or had one. If you are banging your camera around enough to break it, then you are probably abusing your camera anyway. The articulated screen is not THAT fragile, plus it turns and folds in with the screen inside, which protects it from scratches, etc.

More pixels. Yes, the T3i is 18MP and the T3 is 12MP. Unless you are looking for larger prints, it's not going to make much difference. Maybe one could argue the extra pixels as beneficial for cropping macro shots, but even that is only a small part of the entire deal. Proper lighting, focus and composition are more important.

In the world of photography, $200 more for equipment is, for all intents and purposes, chump change. The T3 is the bottom end Canon camera and will probably disappear from the landscape in the not too distant future.

Lastly, the body isn't where the money really gets spent anyway...go price some good glass and prepare yourself for sticker shock. Photography is a long term investment if you have any inkling of sticking with it. Think of the body as something you're going to upgrade or get new ones along the way. The lenses you'll keep and continue to use. Now, if you decide to go "full frame" later, yeah, an FF body ain't gonna be cheap, but by that point, you'll know for sure if you want/need it and you'll know why. So, get the T3i. It's worth the $200 higher price and is a great entry level body that'll last you for quite some time as you build your knowledge and skills.

The T3i will NOT make your photos better than the T3's, but it will have less technical limits that can allow you to try things you may not be able to do with the T3...meaning, you you may not need to buy a new body for a longer period of time to gain capabilities you need/want.

 

[play18now]

The T3i will NOT make your photos better than the T3's, but it will have less technical limits that can allow you to try things you may not be able to do with the T3...meaning, you you may not need to buy a new body for a longer period of time to gain capabilities you need/want.

THIS.