Nikon_Josh
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 95
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Bit of a dilemma right now, I am happy with all my lenses. But for some reason I really am craving a fast 17-50 lens still (I have asked about this before on here). The 18-55 VR kit lens, as great as the optics, the lens feels a bit plastic and cheap, not to mention how slow it is.
The lens I really want is a Sigma 17-50 2.8 (my dream DX lens, the perfect lens to round out my kit but PRICEY) but I am thinking the Tamron 17-50 may be the next best choice. Half of me was considering selling my 10-20 to fund the purchase of the Sigma 17-50 2.8, in the case of the Tamron 17-50 I could afford to keep my UWA and get the Tammy aswell. Which way would you guys go? This lens is going to be my workhorse lens afterall and will be on my camera 80% of the time as my 18-55 VR is now. Recently, I have become a bit irritated by my UWA lens and the crazy wide views and distortion. Perhaps I could do panoramas with the 17-50?
Now the second part of the question is this... will I really see an upgrade from my kit lens if I go with a fast 17-50 2.8 lens seeing as the majority of the time I shoot at F8?
I sometimes get like this, I get the buying drug and I can't stop myself from ending up spending money I don't always need to spend. So I'm wondering if I am being slightly obsessive and part of me thinks I would be better off sticking with the 18-55 vr awhile longer.
Anyway, I know this question is an essay to read through. But thanks in advance for any help!
The lens I really want is a Sigma 17-50 2.8 (my dream DX lens, the perfect lens to round out my kit but PRICEY) but I am thinking the Tamron 17-50 may be the next best choice. Half of me was considering selling my 10-20 to fund the purchase of the Sigma 17-50 2.8, in the case of the Tamron 17-50 I could afford to keep my UWA and get the Tammy aswell. Which way would you guys go? This lens is going to be my workhorse lens afterall and will be on my camera 80% of the time as my 18-55 VR is now. Recently, I have become a bit irritated by my UWA lens and the crazy wide views and distortion. Perhaps I could do panoramas with the 17-50?
Now the second part of the question is this... will I really see an upgrade from my kit lens if I go with a fast 17-50 2.8 lens seeing as the majority of the time I shoot at F8?
I sometimes get like this, I get the buying drug and I can't stop myself from ending up spending money I don't always need to spend. So I'm wondering if I am being slightly obsessive and part of me thinks I would be better off sticking with the 18-55 vr awhile longer.
Anyway, I know this question is an essay to read through. But thanks in advance for any help!