Nikon_Josh
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 95
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Because its not really needed for focal lengths below 100mm.
Unless you want to shoot in really low light...then the VR MIGHT save you from a blurry picture..again MIGHT.
if you get the 24-70, shoot at minimum of 1/125 shutter speed and you'll be alright even with your tremor shake in hands. unless you REALLY shake and not just normal shake...
If you shoot 1/focal length of your lens on a full frame body, so a 50mm focal length would demand a 1/50s shutter speed, that should eliminate camera shake if you practice proper camera holding technique.
VR won't save you from a blurry photo in the dark if you're dragging the shutter. People are still going to move, and it will become apparent at 1/15s.
I have to say I am finding VR pretty meaningless on short lenses now I have a Tamron 17-50 2.8, I have found I can handhold the Tammy at 1/20 of a second at the 50mm setting and still get keepers. The fast aperture is useful aswell!
When it comes to telephoto lenses though, different story, IMO VR/IS is a mandatory requirement in the modern age. I cannot even describe the amount of times that the VR on my 70-300 has saved the day and I would not wish to be without it ever again on any telephoto lens I purchase.
The 24-70 would be a great purchase for you I am sure, my 17-50 which is similar to a 24-70 on a crop body is my workhorse lens and if I had to keep one lens it would probably have to be this lens. Purely due to the fact it is so so flexible, alot of photographers claim that only wide and telephoto lenses make interesting photos as they exaggerate perspective. I'm not sure I agree with these views! The 24-70 range is a fantastic focal range to work in.