Lighting a studio gray background?

[jb_depew]

I have a men's clothing shoot coming up Saturday, and the client is requesting a lighted background similar to the ones seen here:

I'm wondering is if anyone can dissect the lighting seen in these shots and perhaps give some insight specifically as to how the background is lit? I suspect that the seamless is illuminated from behind, maybe with a snoot?

I have 9' studio gray seamless at my disposal, as well as two WL x1600 strobes, 5' octabox, ~32"x24 softbox, three nikon speedlights, a 6' reflector, and a bunch of modifiers.

I really appreciate any information that comes my way.

Jeremy

 

[Big Mike]

Certainly looks like grey seamless and as for the background light, it looks like a single light, circular pattern...might just be a standard reflector dish, or maybe a snoot from farther away.

 

[joealcantar]

Top image looks like a large soft box or panel the shadow falling on the back is very soft. Maybe Rembrandt Style Lighting.
2nd image is a little harder light and may be a Beauty dish.
Just light the subject but pay attention to the light hitting the background as that light will determine if it will go black or white.
-
Shoot well, Joe

 

[Derrel]

Neither are lighted by a snoot. The top looks like an umbrella is lighting the background paper. The second shot has very steep,rapid fall-off at the top, which makes me think it was lighted by a standard reflelctor aimed straight at the paper, and hidden behind the subject, aimed straight back at the paper from mid-back height.

 

[Village Idiot]

Are you getting paid for this? If so, the only thing I have to contribute is: Damn, this guy is getting paid and doesn't even know how to properly light a seamless and getting paid?

 

[Christie Photo]

Neither are lighted by a snoot. The top looks like an umbrella is lighting the background paper. The second shot has very steep,rapid fall-off at the top, which makes me think it was lighted by a standard reflelctor aimed straight at the paper, and hidden behind the subject, aimed straight back at the paper from mid-back height.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This ALL sounds right to me.

-Pete

 

[Ed Bray]

Neither are lighted by a snoot. The top looks like an umbrella is lighting the background paper. The second shot has very steep,rapid fall-off at the top, which makes me think it was lighted by a standard reflelctor aimed straight at the paper, and hidden behind the subject, aimed straight back at the paper from mid-back height.

Personally I think it is much more likely to be a standard reflector on a boom above the subject aimed back and down. Would give a simialr fall off without the problem of trying to hide the stand and head behind the subject.

 

[kundalini]

In my deconstruction of the scene, I agree with the two statements below.

The top looks like an umbrella is lighting the background paper.

Personally I think it is much more likely to be a standard reflector on a boom above the subject aimed back and down.

 

[ghache]

in the first one, the model is pretty close to the backdrop, this is most likely light falloff from the key light placed camera left . You can see more light on the left side of the background and it gets darker on the left side.
shadow is almost at 180 degree with the model

 

[jb_depew]

Thanks for all the comments and suggestions!