Lightroom vs Camera raw (Adobe)

[groovieknave]

Lightroom is definitely worth buying. It has powerful convenient tools... But doesn't replace photoshop for a pro. Lightroom is cheap and all that most people need.

 

[Buckster]

There are features Camera Raw has that Lighroom's Develpop module doesn't have.

Out of curiosity, they are?

Perhaps this got missed because of the page turn...

Keith?

 

[KmH]

The other day I wanted to mention the Bridge/ACR Workflow - Chapter 10 in the book The DAM Book: Digital Asset Management for Photographers

Apparently, a lot of people don't know Camera Raw can batch process images, and that Camera Raw can be hosted by either Bridge or Photoshop, including both doing the hosting at the same time (see below). http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/...-gallery/312977-batch-process-camera-raw.html

Like being able to change the working color space or bit depth Buckster -

 

[Buckster]

Like being able to change the working color space or bit depth Buckster

In practical terms, why is that important?

 

[Buckster]

Like being able to change the working color space or bit depth Buckster

In practical terms, why is that important?

I'm sorry... Did you say something Keith? No?

This is interesting: Learning Center ? 100 Ways Adobe Lightroom Kicks Adobe Bridge?s A$$ For Photographers