artemiscables
TPF Noob!
Hello, :hail:
I have the D3200 and would like a better lens for Macro Photography.
It came with the stock 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G AF-S VR which wasn't as clear/close as i wanted them so here i am asking you all.
Based on this review i have found: Best macro lens for Nikons: 8 tested | News | TechRadar
Would the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP AF Di Macro (Non-VC) or Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM be a better suitor for me who owns the D3200?
I know that the Sigma 105mm is in a different league (higher end), so if i gotten that one, should i buy a newer body camera body? Would i get more features by doing so?
I usually take photos in manual, so AF isn't really required. Usually the photos i take are of cables (being in the cable business) and i wanted them as detailed/aesthetically pleasing as possible.
I have the D3200 and would like a better lens for Macro Photography.
It came with the stock 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G AF-S VR which wasn't as clear/close as i wanted them so here i am asking you all.
Based on this review i have found: Best macro lens for Nikons: 8 tested | News | TechRadar
Would the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP AF Di Macro (Non-VC) or Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM be a better suitor for me who owns the D3200?
I know that the Sigma 105mm is in a different league (higher end), so if i gotten that one, should i buy a newer body camera body? Would i get more features by doing so?
I usually take photos in manual, so AF isn't really required. Usually the photos i take are of cables (being in the cable business) and i wanted them as detailed/aesthetically pleasing as possible.