Math Nerds!

JBLoudG20 · Oct 24, 2006

cal_gundert05 said:
"convolution"...do you mean "integration"?

...proof that math is the universal language. You say "convolution", I say "integration", but we understand each other when we write it.

No they are not the same. Convolution is an integral, measuring how much one signal overlaps another signal, as it is shifted.

cal_gundert05 · Oct 24, 2006

JBLoudG20 said:
No they are not the same. Convolution is an integral, measuring how much one signal overlaps another signal, as it is shifted.

Oops:blushing:

mentos_007 · Oct 25, 2006

JBLoudG20 said:
No they are not the same. Convolution is an integral, measuring how much one signal overlaps another signal, as it is shifted.

exactly

all about signals

JBLoudG20 · Oct 25, 2006

ECE202- "Signals and Systems"

One of the worst classes I have taken so far.

Unimaxium · Oct 25, 2006

What happens if I take the fourier transform of my cat?

http://www.xkcd.com/c26.html

mentos_007 · Oct 25, 2006

buahahaha Sky this is great

P.S
fourier transform was rather easy...

and it is soooo useful in signals!
I do like signals classes... maybe because we can try them in mathcad and some of them are easily done with images in Photoshop

Corry · Oct 25, 2006

Unimaxium said:
What happens if I take the fourier transform of my cat?

http://www.xkcd.com/c26.html

I shoulda known either you or joe would ering XKCD into this.

niccig · Oct 29, 2006

Seeing this thread makes me remember (and be glad) that I changed my major from computer science to art studio!

Corry · Oct 29, 2006

Hey guys! Copy and paste this: (325 x 2) + ((757 + 316) divided by 4)

...into a google search.

cal_gundert05 · Oct 29, 2006

Yeah, it said 918.25, just like Mitiki and Baraki said.

Torus34 · Oct 29, 2006

As Einstein said,

"Ruv-1/2 guvR = -kTuv"

And that's the truth.

By the way, it's all right to subject your cat to a Fourier transformation, but I'd suggest you don't try it with Schroedinger's. The results would be unpredictable.