Micro Four Thirds Lens

[NathanKing]

I'm a complete beginner with photography. I currently have an Olympus E-PL5 with the kit 14-42mm lens along with the faster prime 45mm f/1.8. Most of what I shoot is architectural since we have a neat downtown area in my city with many interesting subjects. I occasionally do smaller objects and landscapes. I have found myself sometimes wishing I had a little more reach (longer focal length lens) for some shots. I'm debating if I should stick with faster primes such as the M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8 and not have to worry as much about lighting or get something adjustable with more reach like the M.Zuiko ED 14-150 f/4.0-5.6? I'm concerned about the sharpness and smaller apertures of the adjustable lenses. I do find myself appreciating the speed of my 45mm because of lighting and depth of field. What do you think of the differences in optical quality between the lenses?

Thank you!

 

[brunerww]

Hi Nathan - if you like your 45mm f/1.8, you will like the $799 75mm f/1.8. It rates higher than the 45mm 1.8 at DxO Mark, and it produces fabulous images with the E-PL5.

Although DxO Mark has not rated the m.Zuiko 14-150, prime lenses are generally sharper than zooms, since they are designed with fewer compromises.

I have a Panasonic 14-140, and it is a very nice lens - but it is not as sharp as my primes.

Hope this is helpful and good luck with your decision!

Bill
Hybrid Camera Revolution