Mommy's Taking Her Shirt Off

[stsinner]

that was a truly creepy thing for stsinner to bring into the discussion.

Best,
Helen

Wow.. I've known people like you.. Didn't enjoy it, however.

 

[DRoberts]

i dont know if i posted this to a person in PM, or if it was in the thread, but the reason why i over reacted is because of the title... i didn't say that, but it bothered me, NOT because I was excited to see porn.. I'm not into porn, and if I wanted to see it, i think we all know theres lots on the net... i HATE it when people post titles whose intent is to lure people in, it down right upsets me... and this one especially, because of the fact that you used a pornographic title, for a child... its so disturbing, and that is why i seemed pissed in my orignal first post

I can see that you were upset about the title, but I don't believe for a second that your "main issue" with this is the fact that you opened it up and it turned out to be a babyand by that you were offended. You have posted so many times arguing your case for the reason you posted what you did, and not once did you mention this until someone else brought it up, and then after a couple of people agreed with that post, you pop up like "Yeah that's it, that's why I insulted him." If that was the true reason why not just say that in your original post to the thread?

Then you said...
"just for the record, LAME is a critique.. its a personal opinion..."

That statement is "STUPID"...That is an opinion.

This is why it's stupid...
In the context that the word is used on these forums critique is a verb meaning to review or discuss critically the value of a photo based upon general expectations and considerations in a specific nature In doing so it is in turn an expectation that the critic discuss values of the photo either negative or positive to define their final conclusion. Your statement alone fails to fulfill the ecpectations and considerations of the definition.

That is a critique.

 

[kundalini]

i dont know that i understand what your saying here... its late...

I'm not sure I understand things at this point either. Let it go dude. You have tried all day to put your point across. Regardless of it's effectiveness, just let it go. Tomorrow is a new day and all of the negativity of today is gone. You said elesewhere that you may consider taking a break. At some point in time, I think we have all done that. Enjoy your time off and rekindle your spirit,

 

[kundalini]

OKAY NOW IT'S GETTING SILLY.

MODS, IF YOU'RE LISTENING, PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD BECAUSE IT SEEMS THAT PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE BEING THRUSTED FORWARD......... OR IT COULD BE THE FACT THAT SOME CIVIL UNREST CANNOT BE DEALT WITH ON A MATURE BASIS. Oh...Oh...Oh... and I want to go off on one.... please stop me. No wait,I can do that.......

NO, I DO NOT MEAN TO BE SHOUTING, JUST FELT THAT ANOTHER VOICE ............ OH WHAT THE HELL.........


Carry on you lot. Who really gives a flying phu¢que to the conclusion of this thread?

 

[Jon_Are]

Yeah, I think you're the only one...

Uhh....no, he's not.

Using a deliberately provocative title in an obvious maneuver to lure folks into your thread is not playful, it's annoying.

Add to this the fact that an image of a baby pops up when one is primed to view something of a sensual nature...well, I'll be kind and just call it unseemly.

This remark...

Only a certain type of person would find this creepy, unless you think that looking at a 1 year old girl topless is somehow pornographic...

...is so out of line it's not funny. There is semi-nudity and nudity in art. Your thread title could just as well have referred to this as pornography; in other words, those of us who peeked within your thread are not necessarily pervs.

But then, if that is your view, I might wonder why you would want to trick such individuals into a thread that contains images of a child.

As for C&C of the photo, it's out of focus, it contains way too many distracting elements, and the composition is problematic.

Cute girl though, I'll give ya that.

Jon

 

[Helen B]

Wow.. I've known people like you.. Didn't enjoy it, however.

That seems to be quite an overreaction - all I've said is that I found the juxtaposition of the title and the baby 'a little tacky' and that introducing the issue of child porn is truly creepy. You are, however, fully entitled to express your opinion, and that's fine with me. These must be difficult times for you.

Best wishes,
Helen

 

[manaheim]

omg people...

stop.

Best way for this thread to die is for every single one of you to stop posting.

 

[LaFoto]

Methinks, everything (and lots more) has now been said. No more need for any new contributions. Thread closed.