morning

[crawdaddio]

Tri-X 400 pushed to 3200

 

[Alpha]

You actually shot this at 3200? And then processed at 3200? It's f'in sweet.

 

[crawdaddio]

Yup. 11 minutes at 75F. in TMAX developer. I agitated less frequently (for 5 sec. every 45 sec.) to keep the highlight detail a little.
Thankx,
~DC

 

[Alpha]

TMAX, huh? I usually process TX in D76. Any particular reason you opted for TMAX developer?

 

[The Phototron]

You should definitely crop the bottom off.

 

[Alpha]

The leak at the bottom is great, not only for the optical shift in his body, but also because it accentuates the framing in the top half.

 

[The Phototron]

The leak at the bottom is great, not only for the optical shift in his body, but also because it accentuates the framing in the top half.

Oh yeah, because the bottom half is so crappy it certainly does accentuate the top half's superior lighting and composition quality.

 

[MrMatthieu]

Nice to see someone who use film :thumbup:

I heard from a specialist that it s recommended to use TX instead of Tmax for such pushed development. Have you ever tried to compare?

mat

 

[crawdaddio]

Oh yeah, because the bottom half is so crappy it certainly does accentuate the top half's superior lighting and composition quality.

Why so negative? Somebody piss in your cereal?
I do not crop my photos, they are all full frame.

Max- I have never used anything but TMAX. It's easy for me to get locally and it's cheap.
MrMatthieu- I have pushed TMAX100 to 400. The results are not as good as Tri-X. I don't usually like tmax film NEARLY as much as Tri-x. tmax tends to look soft and lean toward silvery tones that I find flat. JMO.

 

[just x joey]

i liek this. i want to get one of those medium format cameras.

 

[abraxas]

Why so negative? Somebody ...

Still looks like you're having fun. Nice shot.

 

[alexblackwelder]

I love the bottom part. The shot would have a completely different feel without it.

 

[NateS]

I like the bottom portion as well. It would be too plain without it.

 

[The Phototron]

Why so negative? Somebody piss in your cereal?
I do not crop my photos, they are all full frame.

Half is not negative. And I don't eat cereals.

I don't see why you would give a purist crap about not cropping your photo. The end justifies the means.

 

[NateS]

I think the real question is why you get sand in your vaginer when someone has a different opinion than you. There was no need for you to respond negatively about someone elses opinion, and to do so in a rude manner.