MAV90
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2010
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Orlando, Florida
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hello all, I've been watching this forum for a while now and finally decided to register and get some of my own questions and answers. I'm apart of many forums and I'd have to say, none of them are as informational or helpful as this one right here. The group of guys photographers on here that are willing to help and critique is just awesome and I've learned a lot, and I thank you all for that.
I've been into photography for a while, but just started actually taking attempting it about a year and just getting done with my first photography class at my university, taught by Jack Rogers, an awesome professor and phenomenal photographer. The class is a nature photography class, at first I wasn't to crazy about nature photography, but I was willing to do anything photography no matter what it was. I learned to love it, but I think I'd like to try something else although I will continue to shoot nature.
I bought a d5000 for my first DSLR camera, I think it's a great camera, very user friendly and was awesome to learn on, but the compatibility with non AF-S lenses is killing me. I've been looking into a new camera, one I won't have to worry about swapping out for a new one for a while. I'm leaning towards the D90, what do you guys think? Try and get rid or trade my d5000 and invest in a higher quality camera, or stick with the d5000? Being a college student money is some what tight, so buying strictly first level lenses is somewhat difficult. Yes I know they are the best to shoot with, but I've read about plenty of photographers being happy and producing very articulated shots with second level lenses like sigma or tamron.
Right now I'm using mostly my 55-200 mm nikkor, and I couldn't have you read all that with out throwing some pictures in, so here are some photos I've snapped, comment as you like:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
Thanks again guys. -Marco
I've been into photography for a while, but just started actually taking attempting it about a year and just getting done with my first photography class at my university, taught by Jack Rogers, an awesome professor and phenomenal photographer. The class is a nature photography class, at first I wasn't to crazy about nature photography, but I was willing to do anything photography no matter what it was. I learned to love it, but I think I'd like to try something else although I will continue to shoot nature.
I bought a d5000 for my first DSLR camera, I think it's a great camera, very user friendly and was awesome to learn on, but the compatibility with non AF-S lenses is killing me. I've been looking into a new camera, one I won't have to worry about swapping out for a new one for a while. I'm leaning towards the D90, what do you guys think? Try and get rid or trade my d5000 and invest in a higher quality camera, or stick with the d5000? Being a college student money is some what tight, so buying strictly first level lenses is somewhat difficult. Yes I know they are the best to shoot with, but I've read about plenty of photographers being happy and producing very articulated shots with second level lenses like sigma or tamron.
Right now I'm using mostly my 55-200 mm nikkor, and I couldn't have you read all that with out throwing some pictures in, so here are some photos I've snapped, comment as you like:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
Thanks again guys. -Marco