It is nicely done. However, it lacks sufficient contrast for my tastes. You have the extremes of light and dark without adequate middle tones and values to clarify just what one is viewing. I suppose it is some form of a fire pit. Also, the cropping has it too claustrophobic.
Rusty Tripod
You see I bow to your greater knowlege, BUT.
Extreems of light and Dark is the definition of contrast I always thought..
I would assume (Excuse me for being verbose) That the lack of mid tones would be (in you opinion ) Too much contrast.
anyway . For what it's worth..... I rather like it...
It is true that the highlights are blown and the shadows blocked up. But this is a fire , not a wedding group, and I think that that has a merit in this case... (IMHO).
If you are shooting Digital then RAW will give you more scope to operate.
Take 2 images from the original RAW file... 1 for the highlights, And 1 for the shadows and combine them to give you a better "Dynamic Range".
If Film you are beggared really. Use a tripod, Under expose 1 shot... Expose the next... over expose the third. When printing, you can combine the three, and use a technique called Dodging and Burning. in order to get a composite of the three where the "D Max" is acceptable across the range.
Always assuming that you WANT to.
To be honest I look at the image and seen the flagration which is the fire... Some of the heat sears the eyes (Burnt out highlights) and as a result you can't see the depth of the dark burnt wood (Blocked up shadows).
So... do you want a record of a chemical reaction (Perfect in all details). or o picture of a fire (Which is what you have).