BlueMeanieTSi
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 326
- Reaction score
- 35
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Yeah that is true, I wouldn't mind the 700 either, that's a good point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Get the D800
Get the D800
The main reason I haven't made the D800 my D7000's eventual successor is the FPS. It's a fairly small matter really, I'll end up with a virtical grip anyway and I don't mind shooting in DX mode when I need higher FPS since I will probably need the reach in those instances anyway (sports). My D7000 isn't limiting me in any way and I have several thousands of dollars worth of lenses and peripherals I still need/want before looking into a new body so there is no real reason to make a decision yet. I have also been watching for a D700 price drop, but like I said, I'm in no hurry.
sovietdoc said:The question is, will the entry full-fraimers be banned from weddings like all "pros" with "rebels" were?
I doubt that. The D700 at one time was Nikon's entry level FX DSLR (as in the cheapest FX). The D600 might be someone's backup to the D800.
i havent made up my mind yet but im certainly hoping the D600 is as rumored so far.
I do NOT need a 36mp D800.
I was thinking of trying to pick up a D700, but to me, that would be a step BACKwards. If im spending over and above 1,000$, why settle for another 12mp body, not to mention, yes, the D700 has had great ISO quality for the last 2-3 years? but compared to the new bodies, the D700 had its time but as with anything, its old news. Sure, id take one if i could find one for 500$ brand new, but those that are trying to get rid of their D700's now are still trying to get close to what they paid for it AND their used body has upwards of 100,000 actuations [sp.?]. Tell you what would tickle my fancy, if they took the D700 JUST LIKE IT IS and simply upgraded the sensor to match the ISO quality of the D800 and make it 16 or 24 mp. id preorder one of those right now.
I love my current D90, but i really want to step into a FX body and keep my D90 as a backup when i might need that DX reach.
sovietdoc said:The question is, will the entry full-fraimers be banned from weddings like all "pros" with "rebels" were?
I doubt that. The D700 at one time was Nikon's entry level FX DSLR (as in the cheapest FX). The D600 might be someone's backup to the D800.
The D700 was their entry FX, but by no means a consumer FX. This is supposed to be in the "Consumer FX" category.
Honestly, your logic is confusing me.
I would LOVE to add another D700 to my arsenal!D700 prices are going to drop .... let all the BBers go new, I'll have another D700 please!
Personally, I'd say 70-200/2.8II>body. . :thumbsup:
Mark
Personally, I'd say 70-200/2.8II>body. . :thumbsup:
Mark
Well. i did it.
Im the proud papa of a new 70-200/2.8II as of today.
Tomorrow being my birthday sorta helped excuse-wise.
I dont have money falling out of my pockets, so this purchase will sting for a month or so.
But from what ive heard/read, i wont be sorry.
Now. What/who shall i shoot first?
Get the D800