Trojan1994
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hi, this is my first post, to provide background, I am a novice photographer with a D5000 Camera that has historically been used as a point and shoot camera in the Auto Mode or occasionally other modes. Now that my daughter is playing Club Volleyball, it has forced me to upgrade lenses and experiment with settings to try and capture the action as blur free as possible in a wide range of less than desirable lighting conditions without the use of my speedlight. Typically the events are in large convention centers or high school/college gyms where lighting is typically fluorescent, ranging from dimly lit to moderately lit with sometimes large glass windows providing natural light in the background of the players.
Lens wise I have been using:
Tamron 17-50 F2.8
Tamron SP AF 70-200 F2.8 Di VC USD
Nikon 50mm F1.8D
Nikon 85mm F1.8D
Nikon 50mm 1.4G
Depending on the location, lens and settings used I honestly get maybe 20 pics out of 1,000 that are truly "keepers" in terms of being bright, focused, sharp(only blur being the ball/Not being able to read the lettering sometimes). The non keepers are out of focus, a mixed variety of light, then dark, then light type of pattern when using the continuous shooting/burst mode or just grainy. Also, fair skinned players sometimes take on a ghostly almost glowing skin appearance.
Best "action" photos, i.e. where kids are truly moving/elevating/hitting/digging is done with the 50mm and 85mm lenses, manually focused to an "area" where I wait for a subject to enter it, ISO 200, White Balance set to Flourescent, F2.2, Shutter Speed 1/320, Picture Quality is JPEG Fine. With these settings, my raw keeper photos are better than those that one of the other dad's, who's been shooting pics a while, using a Canon T3i, 50mm 1.4 lens, RAW Setting and processing them through Lightroom.
I've decided that I want to upgrade bodies and let my daughter use the 5000 to take some basic photography (which I will likely take with her) as she wants to learn and I would like to hopefully take better pictures and have a much higher percentage of keepers.
Depending on the shop and/or sales person, when asking if I should go 7100 or 610, I get mixed feedback, though slightly more will say the 7100 is all I need. Initially, to my novice self, it appears that the 7100 is the right choice until I read online about how the 610's Full Frame Sensor will perform better in low light than the 7100's despite the same megapixel count.
Can you shed some light on:
1) Is the 610's Capability in low light going to be significant/noticable over the 7100's when shooting in a basketball gym?
2) Is the 7100 or 610 the right choice for me to shoot indoor volleyball?
3) Is there another body, Nikon or other, that I should be considering saving up for?
Regards,
Tony
Lens wise I have been using:
Tamron 17-50 F2.8
Tamron SP AF 70-200 F2.8 Di VC USD
Nikon 50mm F1.8D
Nikon 85mm F1.8D
Nikon 50mm 1.4G
Depending on the location, lens and settings used I honestly get maybe 20 pics out of 1,000 that are truly "keepers" in terms of being bright, focused, sharp(only blur being the ball/Not being able to read the lettering sometimes). The non keepers are out of focus, a mixed variety of light, then dark, then light type of pattern when using the continuous shooting/burst mode or just grainy. Also, fair skinned players sometimes take on a ghostly almost glowing skin appearance.
Best "action" photos, i.e. where kids are truly moving/elevating/hitting/digging is done with the 50mm and 85mm lenses, manually focused to an "area" where I wait for a subject to enter it, ISO 200, White Balance set to Flourescent, F2.2, Shutter Speed 1/320, Picture Quality is JPEG Fine. With these settings, my raw keeper photos are better than those that one of the other dad's, who's been shooting pics a while, using a Canon T3i, 50mm 1.4 lens, RAW Setting and processing them through Lightroom.
I've decided that I want to upgrade bodies and let my daughter use the 5000 to take some basic photography (which I will likely take with her) as she wants to learn and I would like to hopefully take better pictures and have a much higher percentage of keepers.
Depending on the shop and/or sales person, when asking if I should go 7100 or 610, I get mixed feedback, though slightly more will say the 7100 is all I need. Initially, to my novice self, it appears that the 7100 is the right choice until I read online about how the 610's Full Frame Sensor will perform better in low light than the 7100's despite the same megapixel count.
Can you shed some light on:
1) Is the 610's Capability in low light going to be significant/noticable over the 7100's when shooting in a basketball gym?
2) Is the 7100 or 610 the right choice for me to shoot indoor volleyball?
3) Is there another body, Nikon or other, that I should be considering saving up for?
Regards,
Tony