What's new

Nikon Lens Recommendation

TWright33

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
522
Reaction score
207
Location
Mississippi
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Alright so I am being hired as a second shooter and have a couple of birthday parties that I have been hired to shoot.

I am currently shooting only with a 50mm 1.8g and 35mm 1.8g.

I am wanting a zoom lens. I have absolutely no idea what EXACTLY I want.

This is what I am looking at right now. I am wanting to cover a range from around 20-200 and obviously want 2.8 lens.


I can currently get a Tamron 17-50 2.8 (Used) and a Sigma 50-150 (Used) for right at $900.

This is tops what I want to spend right now.

Do any of you guys have any other suggestions? I am pretty sold on the Sigma, but the 17-50 I'm not.

I'm not sure if I should hold off on the 17-50 and just buy some softboxes and speedlights?
 
I would pair a Sigma with a second Sigma, and I would want to pair up a Tamron with a second Tamron.

Sigmas typically have a much warmer, more yellowish color rendering than Tamrons, and you can not just "white balance this away"; this is NOT a white balance issue, it is a lens color rendering issue; Sigma is warmish and yellowish; Tamron is fairly neutral, like Nikkors are. Is the other guy shoots Canon, I would definitely go with Sigmas, since Canon has a warmer, more-yellowish look that many people like. I would NOT want to shoot a split Tamron/Sigma set on Nikon.

THe last thing you want to have to do is worry about a day's shoot made with two lenses, each with easily-seen "FAMILY color rendering differences", spread over three-, four-, or even five- or six hundred wedding pictures!

I am assuming you shoot 1.5x Nikon.
 
I would pair a Sigma with a second Sigma, and I would want to pair up a Tamron with a second Tamron.

Sigmas typically have a much warmer, more yellowish color rendering than Tamrons, and you can not just "white balance this away"; this is NOT a white balance issue, it is a lens color rendering issue; Sigma is warmish and yellowish; Tamron is fairly neutral, like Nikkors are. Is the other guy shoots Canon, I would definitely go with Sigmas, since Canon has a warmer, more-yellowish look that many people like. I would NOT want to shoot a split Tamron/Sigma set on Nikon.

THe last thing you want to have to do is worry about a day's shoot made with two lenses, each with easily-seen "FAMILY color rendering differences", spread over three-, four-, or even five- or six hundred wedding pictures!

I am assuming you shoot 1.5x Nikon.

Yes, I am shooting with a d7100, and a 3200 as back up.

I didn't know that about the Sigma tint.

So you are saying a Sigma 18-50 paired with a Sigma 50-150 would be a good pair?
 
Sure...Sigma + Sigma sounds okay to me. 18 to 50 is nice. 50-150 is a nifty lens length too. I have a 50-135 zoom that I used to use a lot on 1.5x...I REALLY LIKED the 50mm start point on 1.5x--it is HUGELY BETTER as an "event" lens than a 70-200mm zoom or 80-200mm zoom...starting at 50mm makes the lens just sooooooo much more-useful for events, where things "unfold" in front of your camera...it's wide enough to make the bottom end useful, not always a constant limiting factor, which FORCES you to go to a shorter zoom--which then has ZERO "zooming-in" capability.
 
I have a Nikon 50-135. It's a constant aperture f/3.5 lens with 62mm filter diameter.
 
I have a Nikon 50-135. It's a constant aperture f/3.5 lens with 62mm filter diameter.

I see.

It looks like I'm still going to stick with the Sigma lenses. Unless someone can show me why I shouldn't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it saying the lens if "for/sigma" dslr? And the weight is from a lens with nikon mount? I'm confised


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well I ordered a lens from KEH.

They had the 50-150 HSM II in "EX" condition for a great price.
 
Well here she is. KEH shipped FedEx and I got it the next day. I haven't show much with her, but I did shoot some of her.

$DSC_2417.webp
 

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom