- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,726
- Reaction score
- 5,467
- Website
- sm4him.500px.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
"Out of the shadows" because, while I've been here a while now, I often feel like I do a lot of lurking in the shadows, only commenting when I have something particularly witty or insightful to say. Many of you are now wondering how I ever even got past 5 posts if I wait til I have something witty or intelligent to say.
I almost never post photos asking for C&C because:
a) I have rejection issues, and ya'll scare me. :lmao:
b) Seriously...I mostly don't post for C&C because I usually KNOW what's wrong with my photos, I just have to work at fixing those issues. And I also just read all the C&C on others' photos and use the advice that I feel is worthwhile to work on my own.
If you don't like long-windedness, or just don't find me entertaining, scroll to the part that says MY POINT...
I've said before that I've been "doing photography" for 30+ years, and that's true, but other than a few years at the very beginning (when I was a teenager) I've never really taken it seriously until a couple of years ago.
So, I don't fit the "noob" category, but I want to be clear that there is MUCH I need to learn. I do have a good grasp of the exposure triangle, and composition.
The MAJOR thing that I have ignored all these years is, I believe, why I still often just think my photos are lacking "something." Lighting.
All these years, I'd say 90% of the photos I took were nature and landscape, and I simply used whatever ambient light there was. I did try to consider WHERE the sun was, but I didn't go shoot (or not shoot) at a particular time of the day, I just dealt with whatever I had at the time. Most of the remaining 10% of my photos were never even meant to be something besides snapshots: family Christmas pics, kids playing, etc.
When I got my Nikon D5100, I couldn't afford any more lenses, but planned to save and buy them as I could.
I've just recently finished a good contract job and should have around $500-600 (after buying tires...and eyeglasses...and eyeglasses for my son...) to buy lenses.
BUT...as I've gotten more serious about my photography, I've also realized that I need to really learn lighting better. That is to say, at all. I've done a couple of photo shoots for family members and trying to break out of the "all nature, all the time" mode of photography I've been in for the last 30 years...
MY POINT
To those who skipped all the drivel, welcome back.
So...I will have around $500, maybe $600, to spend. Originally, I intended to buy a prime lenses and a zoom lens (all I have right now is the 18-55 kit lens).
But now I'm thinking maybe I should be one lens and a flash instead.
Here's my questions:
--Two lenses, or a one lens and a flash? If the latter, which lens? The prime (probably a 50mm 1.8) or the zoom (haven't decided which zoom). I take a LOT of nature, would love to do macro, but also want to branch out and try new things, including some more photo shoots (but still probably 80% outdoors, 20% indoors)
--If a flash, what should I get for the D5100? I've read the two sentences in my manual about flash units, and do a little reading online. I'm not sure if I understand it all correctly. It sounds like, for the 5100, the only way to use a flash off-camera is to buy two flash units, and mount one on the camera. Is that right? It also sounds like the flash units won't even work right for anything faster than 1/200 sec on the 5100.
I can't afford two flash units, so if I just buy one, and that one has to be mounted on the camera, will it really help that much?
Am I completely wrong about how the flashes work with the 5100?
I almost never post photos asking for C&C because:
a) I have rejection issues, and ya'll scare me. :lmao:
b) Seriously...I mostly don't post for C&C because I usually KNOW what's wrong with my photos, I just have to work at fixing those issues. And I also just read all the C&C on others' photos and use the advice that I feel is worthwhile to work on my own.
If you don't like long-windedness, or just don't find me entertaining, scroll to the part that says MY POINT...
I've said before that I've been "doing photography" for 30+ years, and that's true, but other than a few years at the very beginning (when I was a teenager) I've never really taken it seriously until a couple of years ago.
So, I don't fit the "noob" category, but I want to be clear that there is MUCH I need to learn. I do have a good grasp of the exposure triangle, and composition.
The MAJOR thing that I have ignored all these years is, I believe, why I still often just think my photos are lacking "something." Lighting.
All these years, I'd say 90% of the photos I took were nature and landscape, and I simply used whatever ambient light there was. I did try to consider WHERE the sun was, but I didn't go shoot (or not shoot) at a particular time of the day, I just dealt with whatever I had at the time. Most of the remaining 10% of my photos were never even meant to be something besides snapshots: family Christmas pics, kids playing, etc.
When I got my Nikon D5100, I couldn't afford any more lenses, but planned to save and buy them as I could.
I've just recently finished a good contract job and should have around $500-600 (after buying tires...and eyeglasses...and eyeglasses for my son...) to buy lenses.
BUT...as I've gotten more serious about my photography, I've also realized that I need to really learn lighting better. That is to say, at all. I've done a couple of photo shoots for family members and trying to break out of the "all nature, all the time" mode of photography I've been in for the last 30 years...
MY POINT
To those who skipped all the drivel, welcome back.
So...I will have around $500, maybe $600, to spend. Originally, I intended to buy a prime lenses and a zoom lens (all I have right now is the 18-55 kit lens).
But now I'm thinking maybe I should be one lens and a flash instead.
Here's my questions:
--Two lenses, or a one lens and a flash? If the latter, which lens? The prime (probably a 50mm 1.8) or the zoom (haven't decided which zoom). I take a LOT of nature, would love to do macro, but also want to branch out and try new things, including some more photo shoots (but still probably 80% outdoors, 20% indoors)
--If a flash, what should I get for the D5100? I've read the two sentences in my manual about flash units, and do a little reading online. I'm not sure if I understand it all correctly. It sounds like, for the 5100, the only way to use a flash off-camera is to buy two flash units, and mount one on the camera. Is that right? It also sounds like the flash units won't even work right for anything faster than 1/200 sec on the 5100.
I can't afford two flash units, so if I just buy one, and that one has to be mounted on the camera, will it really help that much?
Am I completely wrong about how the flashes work with the 5100?