darich
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 1,230
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Near Lanark, Scotland
- Website
- www.darich.co.uk
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Hi folks.
I own 3 Canon lenses, and mainly use the 24-70 f2.8 L USM along with the 70-200 f2.8 L USM. I also have a 10-22 E-FS but don't use that as much.
I've been reading how many people on this forum say that primes are better and sharper for various reasons. I've been thinking for a while now about getting a Canon 50mm f1.8 II USM or maybe even the 85mm version.
The question is....If I'm already using "L" series glass for most of my photography will i gain much in getting the prime lens?
I know I'll gain a stop thamnks to the aperture, but is the quality in the prime noticeably better than an "L" series zoom??
I own 3 Canon lenses, and mainly use the 24-70 f2.8 L USM along with the 70-200 f2.8 L USM. I also have a 10-22 E-FS but don't use that as much.
I've been reading how many people on this forum say that primes are better and sharper for various reasons. I've been thinking for a while now about getting a Canon 50mm f1.8 II USM or maybe even the 85mm version.
The question is....If I'm already using "L" series glass for most of my photography will i gain much in getting the prime lens?
I know I'll gain a stop thamnks to the aperture, but is the quality in the prime noticeably better than an "L" series zoom??