- Joined
- Apr 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,401
- Reaction score
- 5,706
- Location
- Iowa
- Website
- kharrodphotography.blogspot.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've been doing it wrong for so long, and it's been working for me... D:
Damn real world application versus hypothetical and controlled testing!
So an f1.4 lens being shot at f2ish may have a better quality/sharpness as a result of being stopped down a little, PLUS picture overall BETTER lighting!?
Or is that real world guessing, hoping, and wishing compared to controlled testing? :lmao:I've been doing it wrong for so long, and it's been working for me... D:
Damn real world application versus hypothetical and controlled testing!
God damn it... should've just got the 50 1.8G if this is the case. 1.4 is sometimes excessively shallow depth of field anyways.
God damn it... should've just got the 50 1.8G if this is the case. 1.4 is sometimes excessively shallow depth of field anyways.
This is actually a good point. But it would depend on your camera. Some did better then others. Plus the wider primes usually have nicer glass. So you would still benefit from that even if you lose a bit of light.
I would like to see someone do a really comprehensive test on this subject where you see full brand line ups and see how the lenses stack up on each.
God damn it... should've just got the 50 1.8G if this is the case. 1.4 is sometimes excessively shallow depth of field anyways.