Buckster
In memoriam
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 6,399
- Reaction score
- 2,341
- Location
- Way up North in Michigan
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Just wondering here...
When a moderator encounters a photo that's been posted, and has determined that said photo was not posted by the copyright holder, the mod removes it and puts a big, bold, red warning about how it's not allowed, and must be a link instead.
Obviously, if the photo was posted to the TPF server, that's the only viable choice for the mod to make, short of doing an image search online to find out where it exists, and replacing it with a link to that, which is way more than they should have to do.
BUT - IF the image posted was done with IMG tags, can and do the mods just replace the IMG tags with HTML tags to turn it into the link it already points to?
I mean, all the IMG tags do is allow the link between them to show the image more directly than the HTML tags do. Either way, it's still just a link to where the image actually is being hosted, so there's not really a lot of difference.
So, my actual question is, do the mods replace the IMG tags with HTML tags, which is pretty easy, or do they just summarily wipe out the link altogether and post a warning, regardless?
Again, this is not about the ones that are uploaded and hosted on the TPF servers. It's just about the ones that are a link to an image, placed between IMG tags.
When a moderator encounters a photo that's been posted, and has determined that said photo was not posted by the copyright holder, the mod removes it and puts a big, bold, red warning about how it's not allowed, and must be a link instead.
Obviously, if the photo was posted to the TPF server, that's the only viable choice for the mod to make, short of doing an image search online to find out where it exists, and replacing it with a link to that, which is way more than they should have to do.
BUT - IF the image posted was done with IMG tags, can and do the mods just replace the IMG tags with HTML tags to turn it into the link it already points to?
I mean, all the IMG tags do is allow the link between them to show the image more directly than the HTML tags do. Either way, it's still just a link to where the image actually is being hosted, so there's not really a lot of difference.
So, my actual question is, do the mods replace the IMG tags with HTML tags, which is pretty easy, or do they just summarily wipe out the link altogether and post a warning, regardless?
Again, this is not about the ones that are uploaded and hosted on the TPF servers. It's just about the ones that are a link to an image, placed between IMG tags.