Let me do some critics. Note, that what I'll say here can be said to most of mine photos. I stil do the same mistakes and stil learning, but giving a critics is always easyer. ;-)
Basicly, I aggree with Orgnoi1 except of the car. Having the car in your photo is basicly not a bad idea, because it gives a bit life and a reference (what I am missing in other photos).
#1: I have generall problem with a composition. The subject is too far. Take a look at this article:
http://www.photozone.de/4Technique/compose/layer.htm
A high-voltage lines can be also found, I think they have nothing lost on the photo. The house (in the bottom-middle) is too small (or too big to be not noticable). Colors are too flat, you could have tried to take the same photo short before the sunset (golden hour).
#2: the road has the main attention (what's not really interesting). Was it also your goal? The car has to be bigger or disappear, in my oppinion. Colors are flat again, but have bigger potencial for boosting them (saturation) in post processing.
The problem with the exposure is, that probably there is no way to do it right. The sky is too bright (camera directed almost directly against the sun), the hill on the left is too dark -> it is difficult to put them into one photo.
#3: same problems as #1 + I really don't know what I see here: a small village, a silo, a radio repeater...
Hope this helps for the next time...