- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 15,469
- Reaction score
- 7,848
- Location
- Central Florida
- Website
- www.flickr.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
So...Ive been looking at getting a constant aperture (terminology fixed thanks to KMH) tele-zoom, and I just don't have the money for a nikkor 70-200.
I was originally looking at sigmas 70-200 since i have heard some good things about it, but I have recently been thinking about sigmas 50-150. I realize the 50-150 is a DX lens, but i don't have any plans to go FX anytime soon. the D300s does everything we need it to do. I haven't really heard much about the 50-150, and i was wondering if it might be a better choice on a DX body if you didn't really NEED to go out to 200mm much?
I haven't really decided if I want to go OS or non-OS yet, will depend on the budget.
any thoughts on the 50-150? anyone have it and use it?
also, how about Tokina's 50-135 f/2.8?
I was originally looking at sigmas 70-200 since i have heard some good things about it, but I have recently been thinking about sigmas 50-150. I realize the 50-150 is a DX lens, but i don't have any plans to go FX anytime soon. the D300s does everything we need it to do. I haven't really heard much about the 50-150, and i was wondering if it might be a better choice on a DX body if you didn't really NEED to go out to 200mm much?
I haven't really decided if I want to go OS or non-OS yet, will depend on the budget.
any thoughts on the 50-150? anyone have it and use it?
also, how about Tokina's 50-135 f/2.8?
Last edited: