Hello,
Thank you for the comments.
I'm from Finland where these photos are taken. It is legal to take and publish pictures of people taken in public here (with certain restrictions related to "awkward" situations). It is very much seen as a direct consequence of freedom of speech (this is not only my interpretation, but a lawyer's who wrote about the subject in a photo magazine) and freedom of artsitic expression in the Finnish law.
That does not mean that I haven't spent considerable time thinking whether it is "morally" ok to publish these pictures (in addition to being legal). To explain all the reasons would take considerable amount of time, especially since English isn't my mother language, so I won't bore you here. Just know that I didn't publish these pictures without thinking about the dilemma. Also, I don't take pictures without permission
if the situation does not require it (in these pictures, the situation required it - "oh there's a nice moment, I'll go and ask permission to take a photo" does not work when that moment lasts for two seconds).
About photoshopping: I regularly use photohop to remove distractive detail which is not a part of the subject being photographed - especially stuff from the backgrounds of concert photos. However, I'm not keen to remove "flaws" from the subjects in these pictures, as I don't see them as flaws, but things that add personality to the person. Note that for me, the point in these photos is not the visual appearance per se, but to capture fleeting moments of life (sorry if this wasn't a relevant reply to the ThcGunSmoke's post, I can't see the edits).
Thanks for the opinions and suggestions
