Tele Value?

Discussion in 'Canon Lenses' started by spiralout462, Jan 22, 2016.

  1. spiralout462

    spiralout462 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    495
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I know it's a FAQ of sorts but I have been searching for a nice telephoto option for my T6s. My longest current lens is a 55-250Stm. Like most, I'm hoping for more reach, larger apertures, and sharpness.

    Unfortunately I have set an extremely limited budget for this. If I can't find a suitable lens right now I will continue saving for a 400f5.6 or similar.

    I don't want to spend more than $400-$500 right now
    .

    I am really interested in the Canon 200 f2.8. I know it's lacking in reach but with such a fast lens an earlier version 1.4TC should work well. Also the Canon 300 f4 is a common lens and might be a better option for me if I can find one that hasn't been beaten up and within budget.

    I have mainly looked at primes but am not opposed to a zoom.

    I prefer Canon lenses but would consider Sigma and Tamron if the quality is there. Thanks in advance for all your help!


     
  2. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    25,265
    Likes Received:
    4,783
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I'll be honest and say keep saving.

    You're only just under half way in saving at the $500 end to a 400mm f5.6 L sold new. Sold second hand in good condition you might save a bit more so you can say you're half way already! If you can keep saving you'll cover that ground faster than you think and you'll get a fantastic lens for what you need at the end of it.

    That said if money is slow and that next half is going to take a vast amount of time then you might consider something for the now; however I'd wager that keeping your money saved is the better option .




    Note the 300mm you mention is in the same rough price bracket as the 400mm.
     
  3. spiralout462

    spiralout462 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    495
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thanks. You're probably right. I've never been a patient person. lol

    I just want it all!! Darn it!!
     
  4. DB_Cro

    DB_Cro No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    73
    Location:
    Croatia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I was saving for a year to replace my 55-250IS (non-STM) with a Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS.

    It was a very worthwhile wait and upgrade, I don't find it any worse optically then the
    1st gen non-IS Canon 70-200 2.8 that I used a lot recently.

    Maybe you can find one of those used.
    Also, the 55-250 is a very sharp lens, I was very happy with it, I just couldn't shoot concerts
    with it properly because of the small aperture and my T2i not being able to perform well at
    high ISOs.
     
  5. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    25,265
    Likes Received:
    4,783
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I know the feeling :)

    Certainly I'd advocate saving if it would take years to gain the extra; but otherwise I would say wait and hold onto that money and keep saving. Long lenses jump in price a lot very quickly; but the quality also jumps a lot between those divisions.
     
  6. spiralout462

    spiralout462 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    495
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I cannot complain about the sharpness of the 55-250 STM. I have been limited recently in less than ideal light.
     
  7. DB_Cro

    DB_Cro No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    73
    Location:
    Croatia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    That's exactly, as I've said, the reason I replaced mine.
    I tried a lot of "in-between" lenses and figured the Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS is the absolute minimum and cheapest solution.
    I knew I needed 2.8 becuase of T2i's high ISO issues, and I absolutely wanted and needed the stabilization.

    I can comfortably get good, sharp shots at 2.8, 1/50s and 200mm.
    Using the borrowed non-IS Canon 70-200 2.8, I was able to get 1 out of 6 shots sharp at that (or close) shutter speed
    shooting a concert or something similar. I know 1/50s is pushing it re: freezing motion, but higher speeds are sometimes
    just not an option consdering I don't want to push ISO over 1600.
     

Share This Page