Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only in PSAM and since it's processed, no RAW. RAW is unprocessed. HDR is processed for JPEG.I tried all the exposure modes to no avail. I normally shoot raw+jpeg. I'll try it with jpeg only since it obviously isn't going to do it with raw.
Nikon D7000 16 megapixels
Nikon D7100 24 megapixels
Both these images are only half a MP each. So maybe like 1 Superpixel?
Don't forget to account for the different image sensor makes.
The D7000 uses a Sony (not Exmor) image sensor while the D7100 uses a Toshiba made image sensor.
f some not common types of imaging and printing, the MP count of the image sensor is to a large degree meaningless.
Another major difference is the D7000 has an anti-aliasing optical low pass filter (OLPF) in front of it's Sony image sensor, while the D7100 doesn't have an OPLF in front of it's Toshiba image sensor.
With the exception of some not common types of imaging and printing, the MP count of the image sensor is to a large degree meaningless.
Note too that as MP count goes up and image sensor size remains the same, pixel size goes down. Smaller pixels collect fewer photons (develop a smaller signal) per pixel.
right, some say megapixels are "meaningless", others claim the large larger pixels in older cameras, - "fat pixels" produce better images
pity the poor photographer that only has 18 megapixels in a $100 camera
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
Don't forget to account for the different image sensor makes.
The D7000 uses a Sony (not Exmor) image sensor while the D7100 uses a Toshiba made image sensor.
f some not common types of imaging and printing, the MP count of the image sensor is to a large degree meaningless.
Another major difference is the D7000 has an anti-aliasing optical low pass filter (OLPF) in front of it's Sony image sensor, while the D7100 doesn't have an OPLF in front of it's Toshiba image sensor.
With the exception of some not common types of imaging and printing, the MP count of the image sensor is to a large degree meaningless.
Note too that as MP count goes up and image sensor size remains the same, pixel size goes down. Smaller pixels collect fewer photons (develop a smaller signal) per pixel.
right, some say megapixels are "meaningless", others claim the large larger pixels in older cameras, - "fat pixels" produce better images
pity the poor photographer that only has 18 megapixels in a $100 camera
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
Damn! I paid $3000 for a 16MP camera with 1X zoom.
Damn! I paid $3000 for a 16MP camera with 1X zoom.
Damn! I paid $3000 for a 16MP camera with 1X zoom.
I'm thinking you way overpaid "per megapixel" zoom !
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
LOL no thats not what it means.But, 24mp is not double of 16mp, it's just 4mp added to top+right. So it's 1.5x bigger.
You need to x4 to double res. ex: 4mp x 4 = 16mp(double).
But, 24mp is not double of 16mp, it's just 4mp added to top+right. So it's 1.5x bigger.