o hey tyler
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2009
- Messages
- 9,784
- Reaction score
- 2,727
- Location
- Maine
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Being a dink.
Cool story bro.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Being a dink.
Yes yes, call me names, please. While we're at it, let's refute those who say that the Nikon D50 and the Canon 50D are not identical because, let's face it, they have the same number in their names; they must be the same. And then when we're proved wrong, we should call that nay-sayer names!!!!Being a dink.
Cool story bro.
Yes yes, call me names, pleaseBeing a dink.
Cool story bro.
well he/she wants to shoot in low light, so the speed of the lens is important, but yes, the zoom is also very important. I too have often found the 50mm to be too close. The 35mm is a sharp lens too :thumbup:i don't think you should be as concerned with how fast it is, as much as how wide it is.
i'm going to guess you camera is a crop sensor, which mine is. i found 50mm to be too close for what i wanted.
between the two, i'd go with the 35. maybe even look at the 24?
hey man, just trying to ensure the info here is helpful and relevant, that's all :thumbup:etc, etc
o rly? lol anyone who reads this thread can see pretty plainly the opposite. If anything, you got trolled because you gave such a crap what someone with 390 posts said to you.Get trolled. I never really cared what you posted from the start.
I agree, but resolution numbers don't lie and can expose vital characteristics of a lens. And sometimes, people want hard proof of something, not hearsay. I've used the 1.8D and the 1.4D and my experience exactly mirrors those charts.I wouldn't base a lens off of charts.:thumbdown: The 50mm 1.4 and 1.8 are both great lenses. You can't go wrong with either one. If you are on a budget get the 1.8, you won't be disappointed.