Which system is right for me?

mikoh4792

TPF Noob!
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
163
Reaction score
10
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
I am interested in the mirrorless systems, but am not sure which system to invest in.

So far I like fujifilm(xt1), samsung(nx1), sony(a6000 or a7(as an exception)), and panasonic gh4 All these systems have the lenses that would fit my needs, and they all probably produce similar IQ. The main thing I am concerned about is good customer service. I want to have confidence in the company I invest in should I run into problems later down the line.
 
Last edited:
I am interested in the mirrorless systems, but am not sure which system to invest in(not interested in u4/3 or full frame)

So far I like fujifilm(xt1), samsung(nx1), sony(a6000 or a7(as an exception)), and panasonic (gh4). All these systems have the lenses that would fit my needs, and they all probably produce similar IQ. The main thing I am concerned about is good customer service. I want to have confidence in the company I invest in should I run into problems later down the line.

The GH4 is a m4/3 camera. M4/3 is the most developed system with a huge choice of lenses to choose from.
 
I am interested in the mirrorless systems, but am not sure which system to invest in(not interested in u4/3 or full frame)

So far I like fujifilm(xt1), samsung(nx1), sony(a6000 or a7(as an exception)), and panasonic (gh4). All these systems have the lenses that would fit my needs, and they all probably produce similar IQ. The main thing I am concerned about is good customer service. I want to have confidence in the company I invest in should I run into problems later down the line.

The GH4 is a m4/3 camera. M4/3 is the most developed system with a huge choice of lenses to choose from.


Ah I missed that. Thank you.
 
If your main concern is customer service, buy your camera from a top specialised camera shop with a good reputation. They will care about it if anything goes wrong.
As for your choice - go for xt1 if image quality is your priority and you want a system that rivals DSLRs in that respect, Panasonic if you do a lot of video, are not deterred by a smaller sensor and want your lenses to be smaller and lighter, or Sony if you are looking for a fast autofocus and a good all-rounder and do not plan purchasing a lot of lensss.
 
Fuji is the only company, I am aware, that will not only consistently upgrade (not fix but upgrade) firmware, but also upgrade firmware for cameras which are no longer in production. That speaks well for corporate-consumer relations. I have found that the person you talk to, regardless of company, is more important than company policy for complaint resolution.
 
I must admit I am confused, you are considering micro four thirds, crop sensor and full frame all in one post.
The differences are huge between these 3 formats, it like saying I am considering a Suzuki Swift, Toyota Camry and an 8 cylinder van.
There are pro's and con's to each system, customer service is but one factor to consider when getting a camera.
Low light performance on a MFT is nothing more then ok compared to FF so if you plan on shooting in low light MFT is not the way to go.
If you plan on doing lots of serious video then the GH4 will be a good option, if you are looking for reasonable low light performance with good lens collection then the Fuji X-T1 is a good option.
I must admit your question puzzles me and I feel like something is missing here.
 
Come on Ron, Sashbar, Gary A and Goodguy. You've all given the OP something to think about but we are a supportive network here and NOT ONE of you gave the correct answer to this question.

Correct Answer: It was pointed out that all 4 of the camera's you mentioned are different and will work well for it's intended use. The ONLY logical choice would be to purchase all 4 of them. That way you don't have to worry about not having the correct system. All other comments are justification for why you should get them all.

lol.
 
Come on Ron, Sashbar, Gary A and Goodguy. You've all given the OP something to think about but we are a supportive network here and NOT ONE of you gave the correct answer to this question.

Correct Answer: It was pointed out that all 4 of the camera's you mentioned are different and will work well for it's intended use. The ONLY logical choice would be to purchase all 4 of them. That way you don't have to worry about not having the correct system. All other comments are justification for why you should get them all.

lol.
Good idea, will do. Now I just gotta get the funds.
 
Come on Ron, Sashbar, Gary A and Goodguy. You've all given the OP something to think about but we are a supportive network here and NOT ONE of you gave the correct answer to this question.

Correct Answer: It was pointed out that all 4 of the camera's you mentioned are different and will work well for it's intended use. The ONLY logical choice would be to purchase all 4 of them. That way you don't have to worry about not having the correct system. All other comments are justification for why you should get them all.

lol.

Absolutely, buy all four, break it to pieces and put it together again the way that suits you most. We ARE a helpful forum.
 
Why are you not interested in Micro 4/3? I think they are a huge player in the mirrorless system industry.
 
Why are you not interested in Micro 4/3? I think they are a huge player in the mirrorless system industry.

I shoot often indoors and in low light. I like the better iso capabilities of the bigger sensors.
 
If a full frame sensor ends up being a high priority, I don't really see a strong case for the A7 over another full frame sensor DSLR. The size of the Sony FE lenses negates much of the size advantage of going mirrorless. FE lens selection is also limited with the best lenses (Zeiss) carrying a hefty price. Of course, you can adapt Sony Alpha lenses but then, once again, that makes the setup even larger... practically the size of a Sony Alpha. You also sacrifice much of the AF performance when compared to a DSLR.

I have the Sony A7R but I don't have any FE lenses... its a camera purely used for adapting lenses to its sensor. Size wise, micro4/3rds is the ideal balance for me. Might not be the strongest performer in high ISO but its smaller than any DSLR system (lens + body) and practically all APS based mirrorless. It has a huge selection of bodies of different configurations and lenses of different types.... something for everyone.

I'd take gsgary's advice even further and say FF DSLR..... maybe the A99 if its the Sony sensor you really like. A7 and A99 are bodies are about the same price with the A99 having a better selection of lenses.
 
I am interested in the mirrorless systems, but am not sure which system to invest in.

If a full frame sensor ends up being a high priority, I don't really see a strong case for the A7 over another full frame sensor DSLR. The size of the Sony FE lenses negates much of the size advantage of going mirrorless. FE lens selection is also limited with the best lenses (Zeiss) carrying a hefty price. Of course, you can adapt Sony Alpha lenses but then, once again, that makes the setup even larger... practically the size of a Sony Alpha. You also sacrifice much of the AF performance when compared to a DSLR.

I have the Sony A7R but I don't have any FE lenses... its a camera purely used for adapting lenses to its sensor. Size wise, micro4/3rds is the ideal balance for me. Might not be the strongest performer in high ISO but its smaller than any DSLR system (lens + body) and practically all APS based mirrorless. It has a huge selection of bodies of different configurations and lenses of different types.... something for everyone.

I'd take gsgary's advice even further and say FF DSLR..... maybe the A99 if its the Sony sensor you really like. A7 and A99 are bodies are about the same price with the A99 having a better selection of lenses.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top