gsgary
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 16,143
- Reaction score
- 3,002
- Location
- Chesterfield UK
- Website
- www.gsgary.smugmug.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Most of the chumps as you put it dis film photography99.9% of photographers worldwide wouldn't qualify, why make it out like we're a bunch of chumps here?
Most of the chumps as you put it dis film photography99.9% of photographers worldwide wouldn't qualify, why make it out like we're a bunch of chumps here?
What sort of photo would you likeMost of the chumps as you put it dis film photography99.9% of photographers worldwide wouldn't qualify, why make it out like we're a bunch of chumps here?
I never see anyone here talk negatively about film photography- just you trolling threads talking about how much better film is and complaining about the state of photography these days. Post some photos or take a hike man
What sort of photo would you like
Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
How it compares ?Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
My guess is resolution.
How it compares ?Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
My guess is resolution.
How it compares ?Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
My guess is resolution.
You can easily get a 600-800 megapixel image from a 8x10 negative.
What sort of photo would you like
Maybe something with people in it and a high degree of technicality (ie complex lighting), posing, and post process.![]()
But what's the actual point? Where is that kind or resolution needed or warranted? Are they planning to print something the size of an IMAX screen but still want people to be able to put their nose 3" from it and still see detail?How it compares ?Why they need this to be large format film photography ? Why digital is not good enough ? Is there any reason for it ?
My guess is resolution.
To digital, yes.
You can easily get a 600-800 megapixel image from a 8x10 negative.
I can get 1.26gp out of a 4x5 neg. That's far more than any software I have is capable of handling. I have to choke it back to 600mp just to edit anything.