I am wondering something. I for one am no nascar fan and I'm sure some of you are not retro photo fans. So what I am wondering, just in passing is this. Can a photograph be really well done and still be boring. I once knew a man who shot off road racing pictures. The first set he showed me I oooed and ahed over just like a kid. The second sec was about the same but by set fifteen I couldn't show much enthusiam. HE told me frankly he could only sell them to the the guys who owned the car and even then it was better if the car wrecked or looked as though it was going to. I am pretty sure retro is like that, but I also wonder if most specialty shots aren't. You seen one race car doing 200 mph around an oval and you pretty much seen them all, except with a few variations. It's cloudy or it night time but in the end even that runs out of novelty and you just have a car. Is that like the dalphin and the sunset. I am just curious.