Canon 10 -22mm or Sigma 10 - 20mm?

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by CxThree, Dec 26, 2009.

  1. CxThree

    CxThree TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    1
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    If you were buying one today, which would you get and why?
     
  2. Dao

    Dao No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,252
    Likes Received:
    418
    Location:
    St. Louis
    If money is not an issue, I will buy the Canon. Otherwise, it is going to be Sigma.
     
  3. CxThree

    CxThree TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    1
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Good point. I should have mentioned that.

    There's a price difference between the 2 lenses, but I don't wnat that to be a factor.
     
  4. Mr. Murmeli

    Mr. Murmeli TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Finland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I've been thinking about this exact same question and after a significant amount of research in the internet I've come to a conclusion:

    Many people seem to be happy with their cheaper Sigma since it does decent job at 10mm. Dpreview has a thorough test of the Sigma and they said it does indeed work @ 10 mm when stopped down, even to f/11. BUT the Sigma is apparently much worse at range 11-16mm and anyways it has to be stopped down quite a bit at any focal length.

    Sigma has "moustache" distortion at 10mm whereas Canon has more common barrel, which is easier to fix in PP.

    Canon is somewhat faster (though not significantly).

    Canon is more usable across it's whole focal length range.

    Sigma seems to feel slightly sturdier, thouh IMO that tells nothing about how well either of them is actually built (inside).

    Many, many people seem to agree that if money is not an issue and you want the best, go for the Canon. That's disappointing to me since I do want the lens to work well on all it's focal lengths, especially since Sigma's distortion may be unfixable at some situations at it's widest angle. But I certainly wouldn't want to spend an extra >200$ on UWA but it seems I'm gonna.

    I hope this helps, and I would suggest you to read this: Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review

    Though I would also appreciate other peoples opinions on this one!
     
  5. icassell

    icassell TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,893
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Arizona
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I don't feel that either of these statements are correct. I did a side-side test when I bought my Sigma f/4-5.6 (and I could have afforded the Canon) and did not feel it was MUCH worse anywhere in its range. In fact, it was difficult to tell the difference. I'm sure that careful inspection may give Canon the slight edge, but there is no huge difference. It does NOT need to be stopped down quite a bit at any focal length. I love the lens and didn't feel that the rather large price differential was worth it. I would buy the Sigma again in a heartbeat.
     
  6. cfusionpm

    cfusionpm TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I would pick the Canon (and I did). Also, here is a nice comparisson of those and three more lenses: Juza Nature Photography
     
  7. chip

    chip TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cypress, CA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    if money is not a factor definitely go with the Canon. it is sharper and better made.
     
  8. CxThree

    CxThree TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    1
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Thanks everyone.
     
  9. harleyrider

    harleyrider TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    tokina 11-16 2.8 or tokina 12-24 f4
     
  10. CxThree

    CxThree TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    1
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Harleyrider - What's your reason for the Tokina?

    Cfusionmp - Thanks for the review link from above. Thats a good read on the wide angle choices.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
canon 10-22mm vs sigma
,

canon 10-22mm vs sigma 10-20mm

,
sigma 10-20mm or canon 10-22mm
,

sigma 10-20mm vs canon 10-22mm

,
sigma 10-22mm
,
sigma 10-22mm canon
,
sigma 10-22mm for canon
,
sigma 10-22mm review
,
sigma 10-22mm vs canon 10-22mm
,
sigma vs canon 10-22mm