[/QUOTE] Kerbouchard spaketh thusly:
There is no test. There is a reason why professionals use top quality equipment. Half of the examples in this thread missed focus or are blurry. The other half were taken in broad day light. Sure, in broad day light, there isn't much difference between a capable camera and a point and shoot. In most other conditions, the differences are night and day.
I'm not sure what point you are trying to prove, but Posts 2, 9, 11, and 17 are the only ones I would consider decent, and they were shot under ideal conditions.[/QUOTE]
I would wager a tidy some that with the best available equipment available today that you could not produce a picture that would be hung next to a Cartier-Bresson, Manray, Weston, Weegee, or even a Winogard (and a hundred others). It's the subject, the viewpoint, the story that is captured and has value. Good photographers capture moments, and subjects that stir emotions....good cameras are just like computers...garbage in-garbage out.
Went for a walk with her ladyship, who happened to have her pentax I-10 tucked away in her pocket; when we chanced upon this pair just a few yards away......possibly my best wildlife encounter to date.
Taken with an Olympus waterproof camera. I love the look of the shark's eye. Yeah, I cut off the tail, unfortunately. This was a difficult photo situation for me. North shore of Oahu in really rough water that was throwing me all over the place. I was terribly seasick from the boat ride and having a hard time seeing what the heck I was aiming at. Still, for my first (and probably only) time in a shark cage, I was really pleased with the outcome.
Unedited sunset with a Galaxy S3. Used the menus to drop exposure to "-2." I don't know if that means 2 stops, or if it's just an arbitrary scale. It was the limit, though.