Macro lens sharpness and frame cover comparison

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Overread, Feb 5, 2010.

  1. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,095
    Likes Received:
    3,763
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    A comparison between the Canon MPE65mm macro, the Sigma 70mm macro and the Sigma 150mm macro.

    Images from the test can be found here: Triple Macro lens test - a set on Flickr

    An early assessment of this test shows that whilst there is a little difference betwen the frames covered at 1:1 (as marked onthe lenses) the frame area covered is basically the same and for a field shot the difference would not be noticable.
    Further whilst an above view gives a good idea of frame area it does appear to suffer the limitation that a focus error during shooting can cause possible erroring results - a repeat test might be performed with the setup at an angle so as to reduce the chances of a focus error giving incorrect results.

    Preliminary results from this test though I would say:

    At f8 65mm clearly the sharpest, followed by the 150mm. The 70mm is showing considerable softness and this might be a missfocus.

    At f10 65mm is clearly the sharpest again, followed by the 150mm and 70mm which show very similar levels of performance (further suggesting that the f8 results for the 70mm might be flawed.

    At f13 the 65mm and 70mm give very similar performance whilst the 150mm appears to be more noticably softer.

    As in previous tests these results are unedited save for white balance setting in the RAW editing process (all other settings were kept as standard). Further even though results from the 70mm and 150mm might be in question the obvious evidence is that the 65mm performs to a fantastic level of sharpness at each of the tested apertures
     
  2. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,095
    Likes Received:
    3,763
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    IF anyone is interested John Hallmen has now completed a comparison test between the MPE65mm and a selection of his other highmagnification setups.

    My thoughts on MP-E 65mm on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    A very interesting read which shows that there are other options out there for the macro shooter and that several of them can infact beat the MPE65mm macro, especailly when starting to work at the much higher magnifications
     
  3. Montana

    Montana TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Eastern Montana
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Very nice! Thanks again Overread. I am liking all your work to share this info.
     
  4. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,095
    Likes Received:
    3,763
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    soo since you have the twinflash and a 600mm lens already - when can we expect to see you picking up the MPE65mm? ;)
     
  5. Montana

    Montana TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Eastern Montana
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    LOL, who knows. There are a few other lenses I would like to get that are in front of the line. Like the 300 2.8, 24 1.4, 35 1.4, 50 1.2, 135 2.0......
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
compare lens sharpness
,
john hallmen macro setup
,

lens sharpness comparison

,

macro lens comparison

,
macro lens shootout
,
macro photography equipment comparison
,
quality comparison between macro lens 100 and 150mm
,
sharpest macro lens
,
sharpest macro lens comparison
,
sigma 70 macro compare