newest new question of the day

Discussion in 'Alternative Techniques & Photo Gallery' started by mysteryscribe, May 16, 2006.

  1. mysteryscribe

    mysteryscribe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    in the middle of north carolina
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Hertz and I had a discussion on another thread and a couple of terms got bandied about and rightly so. Every now and then that exchange comes to mind not so much the context cause frankly i dun forgot that.. but the two terms.

    High Art and Low Art... I think I know the historic meaning of them. My question is this....

    Do the terms high art and low art create a presumption of the worth of the piece in your mind.

    Ie is a still life printed on canvas in a fancy frame really of more intrinsic value, than say a poster of equal artistic merit. Does the simple application of tyrantical (made that one up) words add or detract from the value of a thing.

    again no right or wrong answer you can even reframe the question ie is a painting of more artistic value than a photograph ect...
     
  2. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    25,295
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Not even a little bit!

    If a piece of art speaks to me, if I find I am having an emotional response to it, it doesn't matter what it is. That is the wonder and the beauty of the subjectiveness of art.
     
  3. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    25,295
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    These threads are too entertaining to hole up here in the Alt forum, Charlie. If you keep this up, I'm going to be compelled to move them over to the Photographic Discussion forum.

    Should I start with this one? :mrgreen:
     
  4. mysteryscribe

    mysteryscribe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    in the middle of north carolina
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Please don't

    I like the people here lol... If anyone cares they will find them...

    However if you are tell me to get back on topic I will. I ramble I know and I probably bore everyone to tears.

    It seemed to me that discussing art was better suited among people who appreciated more than the number of megapix...This kinda stuff isn't about what's in your hand or even in your head its about whats in your soul... Now that is pompus...
     
  5. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    25,295
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    We can leave it right here. It don't bother me none. :) Just checkin'.
     
  6. mysteryscribe

    mysteryscribe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    in the middle of north carolina
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Good whenever I go out into the real world, I catch a virus. It much safer in my bubble.
     
  7. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    25,295
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Then this bubble you shall have. :lol:
     
  8. mysteryscribe

    mysteryscribe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    in the middle of north carolina
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    ROFLMAO sorry this is just so silly..... By the way would you think vincent was a great artist if no one told you it was high art. My God they are just sunflowers, not like its a ham can with a candle for god's sake.
     
  9. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    25,295
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    it's not and never has been about the sunflowers for me. :lol: It's the swirling cloud in "Starry Night" or the quality of light from the lamp in "The Potato Eaters" that spoke to me. ;)

    Those paintings, like good photographs, need to be seen IRL to be fully appreciated.
     
  10. mysteryscribe

    mysteryscribe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    in the middle of north carolina
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Barbara once sent me to see a painting. It was hanging in an antigue store. It was long enough ago that most of the contemporary american artists were living on bread and beans. This one happened to be married to realty developer. Anyway I looked at the picture. It was just a field of straw late into the season. I looked hard, trying to see something worthwhile in it. I didn't want to appear stupid to my instructor.

    I gave up and was about to leave when something moved in the painting. I mean real movement. I couldn't see anything but after several more minutes I saw it again. Finally I saw what it was. There was a tiny cloud of color. Not a cloud more like a gaggle of tiny tiny specks of color. I couldn't tear myself away from the painting until I figured out what Jean had done.

    She painted all th staw bent in one direction. The gaggle of tiny flecks of color were formed into an almost undecernable wedge shape moving the oposite direction. The flecks of paint became butterflies and the movement was the wedge going against the grain of the staw.

    It was maddeningly simple, but if you didn't look carefully you would not have seen the color at all. I have seen some painting that are supposed to leave me in awe that don't. It is the way the dutch masters handle light to make background depth that works for me... Matise doesn't. But thats what some people don't get... You don't have to like it all, just because someone else said it is art.

    And Terri Regardless, I am not hacking off any body parts. (god i hate when I have to clean up a remark). Besides I have been warned by the post office I can't mail body parts.

    ps for really low art see the new retro poster
     
  11. mysteryscribe

    mysteryscribe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    in the middle of north carolina
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Oh terri I bet you know all the words to Don Mclean's song....
     
  12. Hertz van Rental

    Hertz van Rental TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    16,728
    Likes Received:
    45
    Location:
    Where am I now?
    High Art and Low Art were terms used by the Victorians to differentiate between the uses of the various branches of the Arts.
    I believe I mentioned it in a discussion about 'is Photography and Art or a Craft?' or some such.
    The distinction between High and Low is useful but it has been forgotten - mainly because it is trendy today to believe that everything is Art (because that then means that everyone can be an Artist).
    The High Arts are now generally termed 'Fine' Art and refer to things like Painting, Sculpture and Poetry.
    The Low Arts are of a more practical nature - Design, Architecture, Graphics, Textiles. In the mid-20th C they were often referred to as Commercial Art.
    The basis behind High and Low Art is that High Art is Art for Art's sake and Low Art is done to earn a living.
    There is nothing wrong with doing things for money providing that you don't get pretentious and pretend you are doing it for 'higher' reasons and creating Great Art. Calling it Commercial Art gives it due respect without getting carried away.
    The other reason for retaining the distinctions is that if you remove the boundaries and believe everything is Art then you lose sight of what Art is.
    If a poster banged out by a Graphic Designer to sell toothpaste is artistically equal to a Monet, then that means that the output of a photo booth or a CCTV camera is also Great Art. There is no distinction.
    In fact I have seen an exhibition of pictures taken of the Earth from an automatic orbiting satellite and it was billed as High Art From High Up.
    It seems that even machines think they are Artists now.
    But it's all just a sign of the times within which we live (sadly).

    As for van Gogh. His final paintings are, in my opinion, just second rate daubs - the outpourings of a madman (which he was by then).
    He did far better work in his middle period. His sequence done in an orchard pre-figured Mondrian - but I guess no-one here has seen them.
    I also find it amusing that one of his paintings sold at auction for the most money ever paid for a work of Art - and Vince painted it to pay his doctor's bill (1 or 2 Dollars in today's money). Art is never done for money :mrgreen:


    PS And yes, I have been here to see the originals.
     

Share This Page