sigma 28-300

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by puyjapin, Mar 1, 2009.

  1. puyjapin

    puyjapin TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Warwickshire UK
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Sigma 28-300mm f 3 5-6 3 DG MACRO

    has anyone any experience of this lens. Looks like is does it all?? also if it goes to 28mm wide angle would this be wider than my 18-55 mm kit lens as it states wide angle. Or should i just avoid lenses like this?
     
  2. JerryPH

    JerryPH No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    You *know* any lens that does it all, does it poorly everywhere. It says macro, but its not a 1:1 macro, but a 3:1 macro. It is also VERY slow and the optics will be mediocre at best. It is one huge kit lens... lol

    I would not go near a lens like this if I was a serious photographer.
     
  3. LuckySo-n-So

    LuckySo-n-So TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    449
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thank goodness I'm not a serious photographer yet...:lol:

    However, that being said, I have the Sigma 70-300 and it is pretty mediocre--esp. past 200mm. For under $150, it's a great lens, but it is pretty soft throughout much of the focal range. The casual observer won't be able to notice as much, but people with experience, like Jerry, can spot it in an instant.

    I'm sticking with mine for now, as I can't stomach the thought of giving up the $1700 for the Nikon 28-200mm f/2.8

    Nikon also makes a 70-300 f/4.5-5.6, but I don't know if it's $400-500 better. Whatever the case, you'll still want the f/2.8 at the end of the day.

    I enjoy my Sigma 70-300, but I understand its limitations(my friends marvel at the fact that I can take a picture of a coke can @ 50 feet and then zoom the display so you can read the ingredients!:lol:). I also don't know how it stacks up to the 28-300. Looks like you lose some aperture at the 300mm focal length.

    As I've learned quickly in photography you have to ask yourself this question: Can you be happy with the Chevy Malibu, when all the cool/rich kids have the Corvette?
     
  4. puyjapin

    puyjapin TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Warwickshire UK
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    how abt the 70-300 vr lens made by nikon ?
     
  5. JerryPH

    JerryPH No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Only slightly better... but not by much.
     
  6. puyjapin

    puyjapin TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Warwickshire UK
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    so no major advantage witht the VR over say the sigma APO which is half the price?
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
nikon afs 300 zoom lens vs asf 28-300 zoom lens
,
review nikon afs 300 zoom lens vs asf 28-300
,

sigma 28-300