What should I upgrage first? Camera or lens?

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Destin, Sep 11, 2010.

  1. Destin

    Destin No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    Western New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I am currently shooting a nikon d40 with a 55-200, 18-55, and 50 1.8, and I mainly shoot high school sports to sell the photos to parents. I also have an sb-600. I pretty much can't stand having low-end gear, but I'm a starving college student so cash is tight. I've been doing pretty good with what I have, but I know my gear is limiting me.

    I currently have $800 to spend and I'm not sure if I should spring for a new body (d90), or a sigma 70-200 2.8. My plan is to get one, then use it to earn money to buy the other. Which one should I buy first and why?

    I'm leaning towards the lens, just because shooting football with an f5.6 has been (nearly) impossible.
     
  2. Neil S.

    Neil S. TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Japan
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Normally I would say glass.

    Thats a pretty old body though.

    I recommend everyone step up to 12 MP+ now that it is easy to do so.
     
  3. yepp

    yepp TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    i'm sorta in the market to upgrade to a dslr and am waiting to see what the d90 replacement will be like before I decide. I know I'm going with nikon because from the photo's i've seen they show better detail than canon (noticed canon's are brighter normally but it seemed to drown out the detail alittle in the few photo's i looked at). Don't know if you're willing to hold out on not buying the D90 because it's just about out of date in a few months but the choice is yours.

    I originally started looking with the new Canon 2ti. Their lenses are so much cheaper. Then thought about the 60d; isn't quite what I'm looking for considering the price. The D90 or replacement and D5000 seem to be where I'm at. Guess I'll find out soon if the real specs get released soon. If I could afford it I'd go full frame (canon 5d looks amazing, haven't researched the nikon D700 much) because I've done a little research and really like wide-angle lense shots and landscape photography. Med-High ISO quality is important to me as well since I find my self wanting to take a lot of low light shots and my old sony CS p200 really doesn't cut it lol
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2010
  4. photoface

    photoface TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think its better to go with a Sigma 70-200 2.8 lens now.I do understand the body is quite old but I would suggest to wait for few months so there will be new products in the market and than you might get some more choices and can consider buying it by christmas.
     
  5. Sharfy

    Sharfy TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Dubai
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Lense is a good investment ;) as told by my advisers....
     
  6. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,099
    Likes Received:
    3,765
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    If you upgrade your camera body and not the glass the light you have to work with will still the be the same as before, you might get a little improvement in image quality, but not much. You will of course gain improved ISO, AF and other features of upgrading your body, but the quality of your final results won't be massivly different.

    Now if you upgrade the glass in front of the camera body you will get a big difference - a noticeable difference in the quality of your final results. I would say even though your camera body is older you would get more improvement with a new lens - that means a better product for you to sell to help finance toward a new camera body.
     
  7. ghache

    ghache TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    3,570
    Likes Received:
    295
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I think in his situation, a faster body would be better.
    what you need, faster/better autofocus, better iso.
    A 2.8 fast glass wont do miracle if shooting sports with a D40.
    You already have a 55-200 and that lens should be fine for outside sports and even inside if your using your sb-600


    For really low light events, i would rent a lens since its cheap.

    I would upgrade body, for 800 you can get a nice second hand body...or i would wait a few months to see whats coming out
     
  8. Derrel

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    35,456
    Likes Received:
    12,796
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The D40 does "okay" at elevated ISO settings...I think I would say go for the 70-200 lens first.
     
  9. mwcfarms

    mwcfarms No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,656
    Likes Received:
    178
    Location:
    Southern Alberta
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2010
  10. Destin

    Destin No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    Western New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thanks for all the responses guys, I think I've decided on getting the lens first, and then the camera in like 4-6 months. That way I have a shot at the d90 replacement if is out by then and worth it. As soon as my mountain bike sells on ebay I'll be ordering the lens.
     
  11. kundalini

    kundalini Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    1,929
    Location:
    State of Confusion
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    How about saving up another couple of bills for the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8? I haven't compared the two, just a thought, but the Nikon optics, build and performance are good.
    80-200mm f/2.8 Lens Review by Thom Hogan
     
  12. supraman215

    supraman215 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I'm not sure about the sigma 70-200, but the nikon 80-200 will not auto focus on your camera. So just keep that in mind, that can be challenging in sports photography.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
body or lens first
,
lense or camera upgrade first
,
should i upgrade lens or the body
,

should i upgrade my camera or lens

,
should i upgrade my camera or lenses
,
should i upgrade my lens or my camera
,
upgrade body or lens
,
upgrade camera body or lens first
,

upgrade camera or lens first

,

upgrade lens or camera first