rexbobcat
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 5,014
- Reaction score
- 1,967
- Location
- United States
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
skieur said:Well, in image quality the Nikon D90 is not far away from that of some FFs and better than the D600. In Sony at ISO 1600 the A99 is only a little sharper than the A77 not a lot sharper as one would expect from the price differential. Both have noise levels. In Canon the 1DX and the 7D are probably the sharpest but the price differential with the T4i as in more than $6,000 for the 1DX is a lot more than the sharpness difference between these cameras.
So, I find it interesting that you cannot tell anyone why they should buy full frame if the image quality is not considerably better.
skieur
DXOMark rates the D600 higher in everything, but yes, when the ISO performance of my 6D is 2x better than the performance of my 60D, I think it is worth 2x the price.
Downplaying the fact that full frames give better imaging performance does not mean that the better performance is not there.
Objectively, a new full frame at this point in time will perform better than a new crop sensor according to...pretty much everyone...The gap is closing but it's not quite there yet.
Last edited: