24-70 f/2.8 L vers. I vs II?

Discussion in 'Canon Lenses' started by thestereoeffect, Mar 6, 2012.

  1. thestereoeffect

    thestereoeffect TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    2
    So I noticed the new 24-70 L costs a full $1000 more than the current version (which I just purchased), but do lessened chromatic aberration due to improved elements (on a lens that is already stellar) and a larger filter thread (slightly larger lens?) justify the cost?? I'm a bit baffled here. Those who have a better idea than I, please don't hesitate to chime in.


     
  2. bazooka

    bazooka No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,293
    Likes Received:
    294
    Location:
    Houston
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I don't own either lens but I have noticed prices going down on the used ver 1 ones on CL. Just saw one for $820 and had to talk myself out of it.

    If you're shooting RAW, CA is easily fixed in conversion.
    I'd think a larger filter would be a disadvantage as the most common size seems to be the 77mm.

    Are those the only improvements?
     
  3. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,901
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I haven't read too much about this particular upgrade...but overall, Canon (and Nikon) have been upgrading their lenses to perform better. One big reason is that with modern (high megapixel) sensors, the lenses didn't have enough resolving power to really take advantage of the potential of the sensor.
    I believe that was a big part of the upgrade to the 70-200mm F2.8 L IS, and I'd assume that is part of this upgrade as well.

    Also, the old version of the 24-70mm F2.8 L, had a bit of a notorious reputation. While most people rave about how good it is...I've been hearing more and more tales of how the AF just isn't accurate on some copies. They are saying that if you don't get a 'good copy' of this lens, the focus will be slightly off. And some have gone though several copies...looking for one that is accurate all all focal lengths.

    So, that is an issue that has hopefully been fixed with the new version.
     
  4. analog.universe

    analog.universe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Vermont
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I'll be interested in seeing some tests of the new version. All the tests I've read of the old one indicate a lot of problems at the wide end, distortion, field curvature, corner softness... pretty much convinced me I didn't want one. The bokeh was also unimpressive at best. It seems like such a sweet range of focal lengths though, would be great if they cleaned everything up with the new one.
     
  5. gsgary

    gsgary Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,144
    Likes Received:
    2,966
    Location:
    Chesterfield UK
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    My 24-70 is almost perfect so i can't see it being $1000 better
     
  6. Canuk

    Canuk TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Alberta
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    I have been pretty impressed w/ my 24-70 as well.
     

Share This Page