Canon EF 16-35 USM III vs USM II

Discussion in 'Canon Lenses' started by cgennoe, Sep 16, 2017.

  1. cgennoe

    cgennoe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    1
    This question is straightforward:

    There is a significant difference in price between these lenses:

    How significant is the difference in picture quality?
    Under what circumstances does the USM III outperform the USM II and how dramatic is that difference?

    I supposed there may have been a similar post created already, or a good article online that I haven't been able to source online.

    Thanks a great deal in advance!


     
  2. TCampbell

    TCampbell Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    3,495
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    Location:
    Dearborn, MI
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
  3. Shuiyin

    Shuiyin TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2017
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Alberta
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thanks for the references to the links. I'm debating about the 16-35 as my next purchase.
     
  4. fotografdenunta

    fotografdenunta TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Brasov,Romania
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit


    You should look at the corners, version II is blurry. You must shot at f5.6 to get good corners with the old lens.
     

Share This Page