The galleries are as much for sharing as they are for asking for critique - maybe not as straightforward or harsh critique as can be given in Photo Critique, but often enough you also find some constructive critiquing in the galleries.
As all our forums here, it is all about communication.
And you can easily communicate - something, whichever thing it might be - with a photo. Whether that photo is technically perfect or not does not matter in the first place.
The reply can be of the "She REALLY is cute"-sort or of the "Yes, I can see she is cute but in order to make the photo of her better you might consider..."
I don't feel that in the galleries each and every poster necessarily NEEDS to specifically ask for critique. If it is offered and accepted as a friendly means of help for the future and future photos, ok. If not, also ok.
In your original photo, silentrunning, I could see at once that a) this little girl enraptured you with her cute face, lovely hair, big eyes and expansive mimics and gestures. You wanted to keep this as a memory. And I could accept that.
I do admit that I also saw that this is the photo of someone who - as I might say - still is at the beginning. As Efergoh is pointing out, the date stamp gives it away at once. It is so "loud", broad and yellow as it is, that you can't really want to see it in all your photos. Don't you agree?
Furthermore the use of on-camera flash shows that this is a spur-of-the-moment photo (which it definitely was, so maybe there was no way round using it, or else you'd have lost the moment) ... but overall it is your composition that kind of gives away the beginner. You included very much of the background, much of it is unnecessary and distracting.
While I am not too fond of The_Traveler's use of an entirely new background (it looks way too fake), I quite like Efergoh's cropping idea. And it sure helps the overall impression of the photo that the vent has gone, don't you think so, too?
But there is no doubt about one thing here: this girl is REALLY cute!!!!!!