Epcot HDR- Original and Edit

[Parker219]

Do you like one over the other and why?

1.


2.

Thank you for your comments.

 

[12sndsgood]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

 

[Parker219]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

^Weak and you spelled "sandwiches" wrong.

 

[Heitz]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

He's probably an 'all-around' type of douchebag.

 

[sm4him]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

OUCH!

Well, anyway...
Normally, I'd say the second is a little overdone for my tastes, but then I like HDR to not really look like HDR, at least not like the overcooked, cartoony stuff. But my first reaction here was that I like the second better. However, I think the primary reasons I like the second better is that the photo itself just doesn't really hold any interest for me, and so the extra processing at least gave me something to look at. I really don't mean that to sound harsh--photos like this are meaningful because of the memories they hold, but to the casual observer, there's just not much there to hold one's attention.
If you'd just posted the first one, I probably would not have even given it a second glance; it just doesn't do anything for me. The extra processing at least got me looking at it.

Also--the clone job to get rid of the tower is quite noticeable, even to me--at least up in the sky, in the cloud that kind of forks and to the left of that cloud. The Epcot Sphere (can't remember if it has a name) isn't really noticeable in either picture.

 

[jamesbjenkins]

Do you like one over the other and why?

1. <img src="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=21475"/>

2. <img src="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=21476"/>

Thank you for your comments.

Well, at least now we know your pictures aren't any better than your insulting and sexist comments. #2 may be one of the worst cloning jobs I've ever seen on here.

And...you do realize that chromatic aberration is a BAD thing, right?

 

[Parker219]

Thanks for the comments. I guess if you are looking for it, the clone job can be seen. I'm sure if I just posted the 2nd one, you would never know right? Oh wait, I do see a little white above that one cloud that looks out of place. Great eye!

 

[amolitor]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

pwned!

well done, sir

 

[sm4him]

Do you like one over the other and why?

1. <img src="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/attachments/hdr-discussions/21475-epcot-hdr-original-edit-epcot-original-2000.jpg"/>

2. <img src="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/attachments/hdr-discussions/21476-epcot-hdr-original-edit-epcot-edit-2000.jpg"/>

Thank you for your comments.

Well, at least now we know your pictures aren't any better than your insulting and sexist comments. #2 may be one of the worst cloning jobs I've ever seen on here.

And...you do realize that chromatic aberration is a BAD thing, right?

Ah. I think I must have missed something. I always get there late for the party...

OP: I have extreme vision problems that I've mentioned several times in other threads. So, I definitely do not have a "good eye." The cloning job is so bad that even *I* could see it--in the small thumbnail image!

 

[Parker219]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

pwned!

well done, sir

People still say "pwned"?!?! Why did they start in the first place?

 

[jamesbjenkins]

People still say "pwned"?!?! Why did they start in the first place?

The same people that used L337$p33k, and other (0mpu73r l4ngu4g3$. And they started it because they're cooler than you, and needed some way to express that.

Go ahead and google this comment.

 

[amolitor]

Well with shots like these you must be great at making sandwhiches.

pwned!

well done, sir

People still say "pwned"?!?! Why did they start in the first place?

Yep, they sure do. I know, I know, busting on people for using "out of date" slang is one of your things. People also say "weenie" and "lamer", by the way. They also say "oh god my eyes, what a terrible ****ing photograph, help, help" and "holy **** this guy is dumber than a bag of hammers, he just won't give up".

 

[Parker219]

^ lol, you should stick with "pwned". It fits you best. You seem like the type to say that. lmao...that guy really said "pwned". Made my day.

 

[jamesbjenkins]

^ lol, you should stick with "pwned". It fits you best. You seem like the type to say that. lmao...that guy really said "pwned". Made my day.

Amolitor, I'd suggest we leave this pile of excrement alone. He needs time to go produce more woefully flawed images and think up more "clever" things to type out from his parents' basement.

 

[Parker219]

Hi