Fair offer for a Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 and an SB-800

[crimbfighter]

Well, the title pretty much says it all. Here's the deal. I have a line on a used Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 and an SB-800. I've been paying close attention to the used prices for both for a while, especially since the SB-800 went out of production. The SB-800's are going anywhere from 300-500 in good condition and the 24-70's range anywhere from 1300-1600 when in good shape. Now, here's the caveat, these were both use professionally by a wedding photog. So, I would expect to see a significant amount of wear (haven't actually seen them yet, and wouldn't until day of purchase). Now, on the lens, maybe not such a big deal, but the flash, that might be. I know I've read many posts by those I would consider knowledgeable, on here, saying stay away from professionally used flashes at all costs because the high wear and tear of pro use will likely cause a complete failure sooner rather than later. Granted, that also has to do with the care it received, but none the less, it's a gamble buying a used flash under those circumstances. Even if I only had to replace the flash tube in the next 6 mo to a year, that's still looking at adding another $100 or so.

So, I was thinking of offering $1300 for the pair, given all the above cited reasons. I think this is a reasonable offer, and would likely make it a "take it or leave it" offer. Unless of course I see the gear and it's in immaculate condition, though unlikely. Does everyone agree? Or should I adjust the price a bit either way? And before someone says "well just give him a low ball offer and if he takes it, you're good." I know, but that's not how I operate, just my personality. I would rather make a reasonable, fair offer and cite the reasons I won't go any higher.

Thanks in advance!

 

[orb9220]

Same for me. Always offer a fair price. But that is on knowing & seeing the item.

I don't make blind offers unless the seller has given me detailed use & condition info.
And closeup pics of the items at least.

90% of my buying is done on craigslist for that vary reason. As I can see & test the item before buying. Otherwise I only buy from reputable dealers with good return/exchange policies.

As to the SB-800 over last year have seen them in the $350 range. And the Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 at the $1300-$1600 range depending on condition and what comes with.
.

 

[Light Artisan]

Eh, I wouldn't pay any more than $300 for an SB-800 in good condition. With the SB-700 and SB-900 out I see the value of the SB-800 dropping.

 

[crimbfighter]

I don't make blind offers unless the seller has given me detailed use & condition info.
And closeup pics of the items at least.

Agreed. He was actually the photog for a my buddies wedding I was in back in Sept., that's how I met him. He shoots Canon now, so this Nikon gear is just sitting around collecting dust. I asked him for an estimate on the number of weddings and other shoots he did with both, to get an idea of what condition I can reasonably expect. I also asked for photos, too. But he hasn't gotten to it yet. I will certainly retain the right to say, no way Jose, these aren't in the promised condition. Plus, he's an hour away, so I will drive down day of purchase to pick them up, cash in hand. I guess that's part of the reason I wan't to have my ducks in a row, to make sure I bring enough cash.

I also should have clarified, I'm not going to make him an offer until I have seen them, either in photos or in person, and won't pay for them until I've tested them on my gear. My plan was to drive down for a testing, then if they are to my liking, offer him the cash.

As to the SB-800 over last year have seen them in the $350 range. And the Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 at the $1300-$1600 range depending on condition and what comes with.
.

That's spot on what I've been seeing, too.

All in all, I just want to make sure I'm not making an unreasonable offer, high or low. I think if the condition is good, I'd go a bit higher, maybe $1400. My biggest concern is over paying for the flash, and it craps out on me in 6 mo.

 

[crimbfighter]

Ha ha, interesting twist that just turned this upside down. We miscommunicated on the lens. It's actually a 28-70 f/2.8, not the 24-70. So, now I'm asking for some more suggestions. It seems to be a great lens, from the reviews I've read. Looks like prices are in the 1000-1300 range for used ones. I see it's a wide and heavy sucker. Anyone have experience with this lens?

 

[dirtfan21]

the 28-70 is okay but not what you think.. the 24-70 is the best. I have seen the 28-70 go as low as $800.00 and high as $1150.00. I also just got a SB-800 for $199.95 in E condition. So if I was you I would start at $1000.00. Just my feelings and I sure after you see the lens and flash you might have a better idea, to the final price

 

[nce]

Eh, I wouldn't pay any more than $300 for an SB-800 in good condition. With the SB-700 and SB-900 out I see the value of the SB-800 dropping.

I agree and would not overpay for an SB 800. However, I thought that used SB800 prices were so high due to the release of the SB900 and it's potential overheating issues. At least I think I read something to that affect.

 

[crimbfighter]

the 28-70 is okay but not what you think.. the 24-70 is the best. I have seen the 28-70 go as low as $800.00 and high as $1150.00. I also just got a SB-800 for $199.95 in E condition. So if I was you I would start at $1000.00. Just my feelings and I sure after you see the lens and flash you might have a better idea, to the final price

That's what I was afraid of. I've put a 24-70 on my camera and loved it. Weight, balance and quality were exactly what I was looking for, and what I had my heart set on. I think I might forgo the 28-70 and just get the SB-800.

Thanks for the input.