HDR attempt , suggestions plz

[minister]

Hi,
last week I tried some HDR
please Give your valuable feed back

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

[/IMG]

thank's for looking

 

[inaka]

Sorry, pics aren't loading.

 

[o hey tyler]

There are no photographs, brotographer.

 

[minister]

Sorry,

My bad , Now it is fine

 

[o hey tyler]

They're all a bit over cooked for me. I'm more of a fan of the subtle HDR, rather than the dreamy. The colors and silhouette on the last photo are nice though.

 

[480sparky67 66]

I like 3 & 6, but the rest are overdone for me.

 

[minister]

What about the truck , It is my favorite , what didn't you like about it ?

 

[raphaelaaron]

the only thing that looked kinda cool to me is the window.

but, i really hate everything HDR.

 

[Jarmo]

What about the truck , It is my favorite , what didn't you like about it ?

I guess it's a matter of taste. To me that one looks a bit overdone. Seems to be some haloing around the outlines of the truck.

 

[Stryker]

From what I gathered, HDR is done with 3 exposures and processed in Photomatix or similar softwares. They look like single exposures and should not be called real HDR, only pseudo HDR. At any rate, the photos are interesting and would like to see nos. 3, 4, and 6 processed normally

Thanks

Mel

 

[minister]

From what I gathered, HDR is done with 3 exposures and processed in Photomatix or similar softwares. They look like single exposures and should not be called real HDR, only pseudo HDR. At any rate, the photos are interesting and would like to see nos. 3, 4, and 6 processed normally

Thanks

Mel

1,2,3 are three expo bracketing and remaining are pesudo , I used photomatix only , but I need more practice ,
actually at bracketing I choose 0,-2,+2 mostly , how do you decide what expo combination to use , would you give some of your picture example

 

[AgentDrex]

This is the form of HDR that apparently appeals to people...I like seeing HDR when its used for its original intent, to provide proper exposure to the whole photo when there is present a lot of tonal contrast (such as on a cloudless, bright, after-noon)...

 

[minister]

This is the form of HDR that apparently appeals to people...I like seeing HDR when its used for its original intent, to provide proper exposure to the whole photo when there is present a lot of tonal contrast (such as on a cloudless, bright, after-noon)...

Very true , one or more also said that it is kind of dreamy look not what u see with your eyes , which is what HDR is to produce a image just like you are seeing through eyes ,
but my question is than how would you add interest to image , by increase the tone !! or am i wrong ?

 

[AgentDrex]

You add interest by finding a good subject as well as good composition...HDR really only works (IMHO) for landscape, architecture and (still)vehicle photography. If you see a tree in a field, want to take a photo of it, and you set the exposure for the darkness of the tree...the sky becomes blown...if you expose for the sky...the tree becomes too dark...so this is a situation where you use HDR correctly...not over-do the photo...unless that sort of thing cranks your motor...to make the photo interesting....position the tree within frame until something pops out at you...although...obviously...having high contrast in your photos can add interest as well...and so maybe going without HDR would be just as well...I mean...just shoot everything you can with whatever settings you wish...maybe something cool will come out of it...maybe not...but have fun none-the-less...

 

[vapicguy]

I am a newbie, but I like the dreamy HDR look. I am loving the truck the most. The window would be a killer photo in its normal state. Have fun and they look good ( to me)