cgw114 140
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2013
- Messages
- 6,541
- Reaction score
- 6,023
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Thanks. Meant to mimic flat, crappy process b&w wallet-size prints from the 40s. Work-in-progress...I like the direction you're going but not a fan of the lack of tonal range.
Thanks. Fave model showed up with a dark top...Saw her merging with the background. Knew it was iffy at best but thought I could, Allah willing, save it somehow. Wrong again! How do you say "re-shoot?" She's an old friend, game for more, who enjoys period costume.As noted I like the direction, model pose. IMO you have a wardrobe/background conflict. The top is so close to the background that it's blending in, making it look like her arm is coming out of a wall. Judging by the skin tones it looks to be a good exposure. Looking back at examples from the 40's the ones with dark wardrobes were generally in front of lighter backgrounds for separation, while lighter wardrobes used darker backgrounds.
I typically use an 18% gray background, by adjusting the "reflective reading" of the diffused value of subject to background. Adjusting reading to 2-1/3 + will give you pure white, 4 1/3 - gives pure black. Adjusting those values gives you unlimited tonal range

Age effect was unpredictable. Prefer Ilford XP2 Super for its flexibility in post. Leaning toward hot lights, fresnel spots for the 50s "girlie pix" look the models love. Me? I like the look of Man Ray's '30s portrait work. Above all, I'm hopelessly hooked on the look of Julia Margaret Cameron's portraits:Been a few decades since I did much with film. Supposedly the Agfa APX100 is supposed to be very fine grain with sharp definition and subtle grain, but I'm not seeing that in the image??? Looking back at some of the old vintage pin ups, I see the soft/washed out look you described on some of them. I'm more of a Vargas fan![]()
Julia Margaret Cameron's portraits
It's a look I like. Had a conversation awhile ago here on seeing "19thC faces" today.Those seem best suited to the wet plate/daguerreotype/ambrotype look. A MUA friend who also scouts and I talk about period "looks" and faces that uncannily fit a time or fashion. Told she's looking for Pattie Boyd types now. She anticipates huge interest in Boyd's '60s look in the Sam Mendes Beatles biopix coming in 2028.Are you trying get to tintype/colloidal look?