I wish I had $650 for a Rolleiflex!

Seven is a lucky number.

Six is my lucky number. As in I will finish my PhD after 6 years of working on it...


"Rule 408: Time is not the boss of you"
 
I have a Airesflex and it doesn't get enough use. It takes wonderful, sharp images. This thread has me thinking of getting it out again.
 
I have a Airesflex and it doesn't get enough use. It takes wonderful, sharp images. This thread has me thinking of getting it out again.

doooooo iiiiiiiiiiiiiiittt...
 
flexaretVI.jpg


This is what I offered on and won. It's pretty much only missing the color correction filters and lens hood.
 
Last edited:
My offer was accepted and soon I'll be the proud owner of a Flexaret VI with accessories. It just had to ship from the Czech Republic and should be here mid to late April.


"Rule 408: Time is not the boss of you"
 
My offer was accepted and soon I'll be the proud owner of a Flexaret VI with accessories. It just had to ship from the Czech Republic and should be here mid to late April.

"Rule 408: Time is not the boss of you"

A nice choice Flexarets are overlooked cameras. I have a very nice coated Mirar lens in a Prontor shutter which I acquired a few years ago, it came from a closed camera repair shop, I need to find a use for it. Meopta lenses had a very good reputation.


Honestly I think the mid-model Yashicamats like the 124G had a better lens anyway.

Having used a Yashicamat 124G and currently owning (and using) a plain 124 I'd ask compared to what ? The Yashinon is a good lens but not quite as good as my Rolleiflex 3.5E2's Xenotar or Microcord's Xpres in term s of overall sharpness, it also lags behind mu Rolleiflex Automat's (Opton) Tessar at wider apertures.

Better is subjective though, I like using my Yashicamat 124 and can live with the slight differences in sharpness

Ian
 
A nice choice Flexarets are overlooked cameras. I have a very nice coated Mirar lens in a Prontor shutter which I acquired a few years ago, it came from a closed camera repair shop, I need to find a use for it. Meopta lenses had a very good reputation.

I'm excited to see what it can do.



"Rule 408: Time is not the boss of you"
 
Honestly I think the mid-model Yashicamats like the 124G had a better lens anyway.
Better is subjective though, I like using my Yashicamat 124 and can live with the slight differences in sharpness
[/QUOTE]

Yes. I didn't mean to imply it was anything scientific. I think the Yashicamat is overall more natural though. Not as sharp, but this very well might be what makes it "better" IMO also. Rolleiflex always seemed a little more clinical to me - but I'll be the first to admit this is not a scientific assessment by any measure.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top