My niece is interested in photography and going to be taking a class shortly. The class focuses on the art and camera, but not the management and post-processing components.
I use Aperture, and will soon move to Lightroom. But my niece has a Windows PC, so cannot use Aperture or Photos. And Lightroom is likely overkill to start (not to mention she'd have to purchase or join Adobe CC).
Is Picasa still a reasonable choice? With Google's recent announcement of their Photos platform, are they maintaining Picasa or is it a dead end? Any other suggestions?
Thanks in advance, John
How old is your niece? I suppose this could have something to do with the software she might prefer. And, naturally, whether the course instructor has any preferences. Are you even certain she will be using a digital camera? I know of several photography instructors who insist their students shoot film so after the fact processing is not a factor in what the students show as their actual work.
IMO Picasa is a fine, basic, semi-automatic editor best used for simple, basic, semi-automatic functions. I use Picasa for quick touch ups and photos that don't require or benefit from extensive editing. I shoot almost exclusively in RAW capture which always gives me an original to return to later. I am, though, an older photographer who learned to get the image pretty much as I want it before I release the shutter. Many up and coming shooters tend to see their computer as the final say in what an image should be. I rather detest sitting at the computer making corrections and "creating" a shot that wasn't in my viewfinder.
Possibly, because I don't "fully appreciate" the editing process, I will say there are times I can do almost anything I feel necessary to a good shot with Picasa's rather limited set of options. Crop, touch up contrast and sharpen and I'm basically done when I use Picasa.
I also don't print anything beyond 5X7 without more extensive editing. Could be that, should I want a 20x30 print, I wouldn't think Picasa was worth the minimal amount of time required. I don't so I don't even think about that really.
In the case of a student photographer I'd say Picasa is analogous to moving the camera to "P". The software still does the bulk of the work yet still leaves enough of the photographer's thinking in the final product to be satisfactory. As skills increase, move the settings one more time.
Besides, Picasa is free - if you don't count giving all of your information to Google. (They already have it anyway.) You're certainly not tied to Picasa forever. You save the Picasa edit and you still have the original to work on later. Like looking at your photography skills improving over time, so too Picasa can be your baseline for editing. Come back in six months and a year's time and determine whether you're actually making any progress or just spinning your wheels taking photos of rocks.
There are several good freeware editors to select from. A word of caution though; I tried a recommended download and what came with it was a virus which crashed my Windows based laptop. That might be one advantage to Picasa, you can go right to the source without problems for the download.