IT'S OFFICIAL... lostprophet has lost his mind!

[lostprophet]

It's true, I have!

I mean who in their right mind lays in the mud with a 300 2.8 and takes a photo of a Cowslip?

ME

Think about it, one of the best sports/wildlife lenses around used to take a photo of a small plant about 6inches in height and about 3meters away

 

[Corry]

It's NEWS that you've lost your mind?

Great shot, btw.

 

[Antarctican]

[Heehee, the mental image I have, after that description, is priceless. :crazy: ]

Nice pic.

 

[lostprophet]

It's NEWS that you've lost your mind?

Great shot, btw.

well....yeah:crazy:

[Heehee, the mental image I have, after that description, is priceless. :crazy: ]

Nice pic.

:er: :greenpbl:

 

[Chris of Arabia]

Seems to isolate the humble cowslip perfectly IMNSHO. Dare one enquire as to the trade price of the optic in question?

>;o))

 

[tpe]

Daisies on the lawn at daybreak, 30 paces and take your seconds, lovely shot.

tim

 

[Fangman]

I'm glad I am not the only madman around - well worth the effort but i have to answer 'er indoors about how exactly did I get mud down the front of a clean shirt!

The result was well worth the effort. I like the so called macro of my Sigma 200mm 2.8 for the same use as well as captuing the feathered friends.

 

[Jeff Canes]

It's true, I have!--

it maybe be news to you but we already knew

also good job

 

[LaFoto]

Well, I think the photo shows why you now need that name change.
LostMind.
Not lost on the little flower!
It'll appreciate it, and I do, too!

(Do I have to mention that I am quite a bit partial to the colours in this photo?)

 

[Tantalus]

nice shot

 

[zendianah]

Love it. I love the border...

 

[Rayna']

it maybe be news to you but we already knew

also good job

:lmao:

 

[Tangerini]

LOL well the mud was worth it, if it had been me I'd just have a muddy shirt.

 

[nakedyak]

is your 300mm the IS or non IS?

 

[lostprophet]

Seems to isolate the humble cowslip perfectly IMNSHO. Dare one enquire as to the trade price of the optic in question?

>;o))

all I'll say is that the cost of the lens is a LOT

I'm glad I am not the only madman around - well worth the effort but i have to answer 'er indoors about how exactly did I get mud down the front of a clean shirt!

The result was well worth the effort. I like the so called macro of my Sigma 200mm 2.8 for the same use as well as captuing the feathered friends.

you should see the state I get in when photography waterfowl, we are talking, mud, water and duck poo

it maybe be news to you but we already knew

also good job

to you I say this " "

(Do I have to mention that I am quite a bit partial to the colours in this photo?)

I never knew that

is your 300mm the IS or non IS?

its the IS version